About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Abstract

 

This article in AJ

  1. Vol. 100 No. 3, p. 765-770
     
    Received: Jan 25, 2007


    * Corresponding author(s): j-muir@tamu.edu
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2134/agronj2007.0042

Harvest Techniques Change Annual Warm-Season Legume Forage Yield and Nutritive Value

  1. James P. Muir *a,
  2. Twain J. Butlerb,
  3. Richard M. Wolfea and
  4. John R. Bowa
  1. a Texas AgriLife Res., Stephenville, TX 76401
    b The Noble Foundation, 2510 Sam Noble Parkway, Ardmore, OK 73401

Abstract

Comparison among warm-season legume forage trials may not be valid if harvest techniques vary. To address this question, herbage dry matter (DM) yields, branching, crude protein (CP), and fiber concentrations for nine warm-season annual herbaceous legumes were measured by hand-plucking all leaves and pliable tips or clipping at 7.5- or 15-cm height. The experiment was conducted in Texas on a Windthorst fine sandy loam over 2 yr. Harvest technique did not affect DM yield in 2004, but the hand-plucked harvest technique produced 34 to 39% less forage in 2005 (low rainfall year) compared with the clipped plots. Most entries had greater branching on hand-plucked than on clipped plants (entry by harvest P < 0.05). Crude protein concentration was greater (P < 0.05) and fiber concentrations lower in the hand-plucked compared with the clipped plants. These results suggest that neither yields nor nutritive values of hand-plucked forage trials examining annual warm-season herbaceous legumes should be compared with clipped forage trials, whereas clipping heights may be less problematic. Results support a careful choice of experiment harvest technique based on the future field-scale harvest method or degree of target herbivore selectivity.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2008. American Society of AgronomyCopyright © 2008 by the American Society of Agronomy