About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions

Members of ASA, CSSA, and SSSA: Due to system upgrades, your subscriptions in the digital library will be unavailable from May 15th to May 22nd. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause, and thank you for your patience. If you have any questions, please call our membership department at 608-273-8080.


Institutional Subscribers: Institutional subscription access will not be interrupted for existing subscribers who have access via IP authentication, though new subscriptions or changes will not be available during the upgrade period. For questions, please email us at: queries@dl.sciencesocieties.org or call Danielle Lynch: 608-268-4976.



This article in AJ

  1. Vol. 100 No. 4, p. 1070-1076
    Received: Aug 23, 2007

    * Corresponding author(s): laboski@wisc.edu
Request Permissions


Evaluation of the Illinois Soil Nitrogen Test in the North Central Region of the United States

  1. C. A. M. Laboski *a,
  2. J. E. Sawyerb,
  3. D. T. Waltersc,
  4. L. G. Bundya,
  5. R. G. Hoeftd,
  6. G. W. Randalle and
  7. T. W. Andraskia
  1. a Dep. Soil Sci., Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison, 1525 Observatory Dr., Madison, WI 53706
    b Dep. of Agronomy, 2104 Agronomy Hall, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011
    c Dep. of Agronomy, Univ. of Nebraska, 261 Plant Sci. Building, Lincoln, NE 68583
    d Dep. of Crop Sci., Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1102 S. Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL 61801
    e Univ. of Minnesota, Southern Research and Outreach Center, 35838 120th St., Waseca, MN 56093


Recently the Illinois soil nitrogen test (ISNT) was proposed as a means to identify fields where corn (Zea mays L.) will not respond to additional N fertilizer and which may also be used to predict the economic optimum N rate (EONR). Data from 96 corn N rate response trials across Iowa, Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, and Wisconsin were compiled to evaluate the usefulness of the ISNT in identifying nonresponsive fields, predicting EONR, and estimating mineralizable N. At each trial site, multiple rates of fertilizer N were applied, including zero N and nonyield limiting rates. Corn was grown following several crops. The ISNT could not accurately predict nonresponsive sites, nor could it reliably estimate EONR. Subsetting the data based on soil drainage class and previous crop did not improve the predictive capability of the ISNT even though ISNT values were significantly different among previous crops and soil drainage classes. The ISNT was strongly correlated to soil organic matter (OM) and was apparently measuring a constant fraction of total soil N (TN). The lack of correlation between the ISNT and relative N uptake (check plot N uptake/N uptake at the maximum N rate) suggests that the ISNT is not measuring the readily mineralizable fraction of soil N. Based on results of this project, the ISNT is not suggested for use in adjusting N rate recommendations for corn in the North Central Region (Corn Belt) of the United States.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2008. American Society of AgronomyCopyright © 2008 by the American Society of Agronomy