About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions

Members of ASA, CSSA, and SSSA: Due to system upgrades, your subscriptions in the digital library will be unavailable from May 15th to May 22nd. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause, and thank you for your patience. If you have any questions, please call our membership department at 608-273-8080.


Institutional Subscribers: Institutional subscription access will not be interrupted for existing subscribers who have access via IP authentication, though new subscriptions or changes will not be available during the upgrade period. For questions, please email us at: queries@dl.sciencesocieties.org or call Danielle Lynch: 608-268-4976.



This article in AJ

  1. Vol. 100 No. 5, p. 1221-1229
    Received: Aug 15, 2007

    * Corresponding author(s): jahernan@umn.edu
Request Permissions


Estimating Uncertainty of Economically Optimum Fertilizer Rates

  1. Jose A. Hernandez * and
  2. David J. Mulla
  1. Dep. of Soil, Water, and Climate, Univ. of Minnesota, 1991 Upper Buford Circle, Saint Paul, MN 55108. Contribution of the Precision Agriculture Center, Univ. of Minnesota


Optimal N fertilization in agricultural production is necessary to achieve both economical success and to minimize nitrate transport to surface and subsurface waters. The degree of uncertainty associated with economically optimum fertilizer rate (EOR) estimation is generally overlooked, and there are no standard procedures to calculate confidence intervals (CIs) of EORs. In this paper, we present methodologies for the estimation of CIs around ex post EORs. We review four CI methods and illustrate the procedures with a sample dataset consisting of five sites, showing computations involved. Ranges in CIs about the EOR values for sites 1 through 5 (averaged across CI methods) were 15.8, 59.9, 41.7, 62.1, and 203.6 kg N ha−1, respectively. Ranges in the 90% CI of EOR values at sites 2 to 5 were quite large relative to EOR values themselves, ranging from 29 to 106% of EOR values. Classical symmetrical CIs were not adequate for economical optima of fertilizer response curves. Wald CIs as compared with profile-likelihood based CIs tended to overestimate the lower bound and underestimate the upper bound of the EOR CI. Profile-likelihood based CIs provide a superior, computationally viable methodology for EOR uncertainty estimation in nonlinear fertilizer response models. The bootstrap CI methodologies showed great potential to evaluate the uncertainty of EORs. When compared with the profile-likelihood based CIs in our experimental areas, both bootstrapped CIs were likely to give comparable estimates for the lower bound of the CIs. The upper bounds were similar to or lower than the likelihood-based CIs. In all locations these distribution-free CIs performed better than the classical symmetrical Wald CI.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2008. American Society of AgronomyCopyright © 2008 by the American Society of Agronomy