Canola–Wheat Intercrops for Improved Agronomic Performance and Integrated Pest Management
- Jeremy D. Hummel *a,
- Lloyd M. Dosdalla,
- George W. Claytonb,
- T. Kelly Turkingtonc,
- Newton Z. Lupwayid,
- K. Neil Harkerc and
- John T. O'Donovanc
- a Dep. of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, 4-10 Agriculture/Forestry Centre, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2P5
b Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 5403-1 Ave. S, Lethbridge, AB, Canada T1J 4B1
c Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 6000 C&E Trail, Lacombe, AB, Canada T4L 1W1
d Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Box 29, Beaverlodge, AB, Canada T0H 0C0
Intercropping can enhance yields and reduce pest infestations, but investigations of intercropping regimes using crop species common to the large-scale monoculture production systems of western Canada have not examined these diverse elements. Intercrops of canola (Brassica napus L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) were established at three sites in Alberta, Canada in 2005 and 2006 to determine interactions between intercropping regimes and crop grain and biomass yield, crop quality characteristics, soil microbial community biomass and diversity, flea beetles (Phyllotreta spp., Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), and wheat leaf diseases. The study also investigated effects on flea beetles and soil microbial communities of a canola seed treatment containing a neonicotinoid insecticide and fungicides. Crop yields were comparable between intercrops and monocultures of canola and wheat. Crop quality characteristics and flea beetle feeding damage to canola seedlings had variable responses to intercropping. Flea beetle feeding was reduced with the inclusion of the seed treatment by between 1 and 20% damaged leaf area, although only one site-year had damage levels great enough to overcome plant compensatory abilities in untreated plots. The first true-leaf stage of canola development experienced the greatest flea beetle damage. Proportions of pathogen-infected wheat leaf tissue were up to 2.5 times greater in intercrops than wheat monocultures but tended to decrease as the proportion of canola in the intercrops increased. Soil microbial parameters were unaffected by factors investigated. Although intercrop yields approximated those of monocultures, additional benefits of canola–wheat intercrops determined in this study appear insufficient to recommend this system for widespread adoption.Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.
Copyright © 2009.