About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions

Agronomy Journal Abstract - COTTON

Sand Abrasion Injury and Biomass Partitioning in Cotton Seedlings


This article in AJ

  1. Vol. 101 No. 6, p. 1297-1303
    Received: Feb 4, 2009

    * Corresponding author(s): Jeff.Baker@ars.usda.gov
Request Permissions

  1. Jeffrey T. Baker *a,
  2. Bobbie McMichaelb,
  3. John J. Burkeb,
  4. Dennis C. Gitzb,
  5. Robert J. Lascanob and
  6. Jhonathan E. Ephrathc
  1. a USDA-ARS, Plant Stress and Water Conservation Laboratory, 302 West I-20, Big Spring, TX, 79720
    b USDA-ARS, Plant Stress and Water Conservation Laboratory, 3810 4th Street, Lubbock, TX 79415
    c Wyler Department of Dryland Agriculture, Jacob Blaustein Institute for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, 84990 Midreshet Ben-Gurion, Israel


Wind blown soil particle abrasion negatively impacts millions of hectares of crops annually. The goal of this study was to examine the effects of wind and wind blown sand abrasion damage on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) seedling biomass partitioning to leaves, stems, and roots. Seedlings of three cotton cultivars were exposed to no wind (untreated controls) or sand abrasive flux densities of 0, 0.1, 0.25, 0.35, and 0.5 g cm−1 width s−1 at a wind velocity of 13.4 m s−1 in a suction-type laboratory wind tunnel. Plants were destructively sampled at the time of the sand abrasion treatment and at approximately 2 and 4 wk after exposure. These three sampling dates provided two time intervals for assessing the amount of plant damage and regrowth using classical growth analysis. With increasing sand, abrasive flux density, whole plant, leaf, stem, and root biomass, as well as leaf area, were all reduced in both harvest intervals (P ≤ 0.05). Net assimilation rate (NAR) accounted for 96 and 75% of the variability in relative growth rate (RGR) in the first and second harvest intervals, respectively, with small but significant differences in leaf area ratio (LAR). Increasing plant damage caused by sand abrasion treatment resulted in preferential biomass partitioning to the damaged stems rather than roots during the first harvest interval, while a much more stable allometric allocation of biomass among plant organs was observed in the second harvest interval.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2009. American Society of AgronomyCopyright © 2009 by the American Society of Agronomy