About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Abstract

 

This article in AJ

  1. Vol. 103 No. 4, p. 961-971
     
    Received: Sept 22, 2010


    * Corresponding author(s): j.k.ladha@cgiar.org
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
Request Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2134/agronj2010.0394

Tillage and Crop Establishment Affects Sustainability of South Asian Rice–Wheat System

  1. Mahesh K. Gathalaa,
  2. J. K. Ladha *a,
  3. Vivak Kumarab,
  4. Yashpal S. Saharawata,
  5. Virender Kumarab,
  6. Paradeep Kumar Sharmac,
  7. Sheetal Sharmaa and
  8. Himanshu Pathakd
  1. a International Rice Research Institute– National Agriculture Science Center, New Delhi, India
    b Sardar Vallabbhai Patel University of Agriculture and Technology, Modipuram, Meerut, India
    c Chaudhary Sarvan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Agriculture University, Palampur, Palampur, India
    d Indian Agriculture Research Institute, Pusa, New Delhi, India

Abstract

Rice (Oryza sativa L.)–wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is the major cropping system occupying 13.5 million ha in the Indo-Gangetic Plains of South Asia. Conventional-tillage practices are resource and cost intensive. A 7-yr study evaluated six treatments (T) involving three tillage methods and two rice establishment methods on crop yield, water productivity, and economic profitability in a rice–wheat rotation. Average rice yields in the conventional practice of puddling and transplanting without (T1) and with (T2) mid-season alternate wetting-drying were highest (7.81–8.10 Mg ha−1) and increased with time (0.26 Mg ha−1 yr−1) in T2. Compared to T1, rice yields in direct drill-seeding with zero-tillage averaged 16% lower on flat (T5) and 43% lower in raised beds (T3). Rice yield in raised beds (T3 and T4) decreased with time (0.14–0.45 Mg ha−1 yr−1). Conversely, wheat yielded 18% higher after zero compared to conventional-tillage. Treatment 2, despite low soil matric potential during vegetative development, had higher water productivity with 25% less water use compared with T1 and 19% less compared with other treatments. Conventional-tillage and crop establishment practices had higher net cash return in rice but in wheat it was higher with zero-tillage. Overall, T2 and T5 had the highest net returns (∼1225US$) and T3 and T4 had the lowest (747–846 US$) in the rice–wheat system. Zero-tillage on flat beds (T5), however, would conceivably be more sustainable than the conventional T2 in the long-run. Yields of zero-tillage with direct-seeding of rice on flat beds (T5) must improve before adoption occurs.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2011. Copyright © 2011 by the American Society of Agronomy, Inc.