About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Abstract

 

This article in AJ

  1. Vol. 105 No. 6, p. 1695-1706
    OPEN ACCESS
     
    Received: Apr 15, 2013
    Published: October 24, 2013


    * Corresponding author(s): brian.beres@agr.gc.ca
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2134/agronj2013.0192

A Canadian Ethanol Feedstock Study to Benchmark the Relative Performance of Triticale: I. Agronomics

  1. Brian Beres *a,
  2. Curtis Pozniakb,
  3. Francois Eudesa,
  4. Robert Grafa,
  5. Harpinder Randhawaa,
  6. Don Salmonc,
  7. Grant McLeoda,
  8. Yves Dione,
  9. Byron Irvinef,
  10. Harvey Voldengg,
  11. Richard Martinh,
  12. Denis Pageaui,
  13. Andre Comeauj,
  14. Ronald DePauwd,
  15. Sherrilyn Phelpsk and
  16. Dean Spanerl
  1. a Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research Centre, 5403 1st Avenue South, Lethbridge, AB, Canada T1J 4B1
    b Crop Development Centre, Dep. of Plant Sciences, Univ. of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, Canada S7N 5A8
    c Alberta Agriculture, Field Crop Development Centre, 5030 50th Street, Lacombe, AB, Canada T4L 1W8
    e CÉROM Agronome, 740 chemin Trudeau, Saint-Mathieu-de-Beloeil, QC, Canada J3G 4S5
    f Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Brandon Research Centre, Box 1000A, R.R. 3, Brandon, MB, Canada R7A 5Y3
    g Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Eastern Cereal and Oilseed Research Centre, 960 Carling Ave., Ottawa, ON, Canada K1A 0C6
    h Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Crops and Livestock Research Centre, P.O. Box 1210, Charlottetown, PEI, Canada C1A 7M8
    i Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Research Farm, 1468 Saint-Cyrille St., Normandin, QC, Canada G8M 4K3
    j Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Research Station, 2560 Hochelaga, Sainte-Foy, QC, Canada G1V 2J3
    d Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Semi-arid Prairie Agricultural Research Centre, P.O. Box 1030, Swift Current, SK, Canada S9H 3X2
    k Saskatchewan Ministry of Agriculture, 1192-102nd Street, North Battleford, SK, Canada S9A 1E9
    l Dep. of Agricultural, Food, and Nutritional Sciences, Univ. of Alberta, 410 Ag/Forestry Building, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2P5

Abstract

A need has been identified for alternative crop(s) with high grain yield, low grain protein concentration, and high starch for the ethanol industry. The objective of this study was to benchmark the relative performance of triticale (×Triticosecale ssp.) to wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) classes currently utilized for ethanol production. Sixteen cultivars—three triticale, four Canada prairie spring (CPS) wheat, three Canada western soft white spring wheat (CWSWS), two Canada western red spring (CWRS) wheat, and four Canada western general purpose (CWGP) candidate cultivars—were grown at 36 locations across western Canada from 2006 to 2009. The performance of these cereal classes can generally be summarized as triticale = Hoffman (CWGP) = CWSWS > CPS white > CPS red > CWRS for most variables. The triticale and white wheats produced 12 and 13% more grain, respectively, than the hard red spring wheats. Among the triticales, AC Ultima’s and Pronghorn’s yield potential were most notable because they exceeded the CWRS cultivars AC Barrie and AC Superb by an average of 32% and the CPS red cultivars 5700PR and AC Crystal by 18%. The triticales and Hoffman matured later than most other cultivars. Pronghorn consistently displayed low levels of fusarium head blight (FHB), Septoria nodorum blotch, and powdery mildew, but elevated ergot levels were observed for all triticales. We conclude that triticale would be superior to CPS and CWRS wheat and similar to CWSWS in many agronomic traits desired by ethanol fermentation plants and is superior for biomass production.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2013. Copyright © 2013 by the American Society of Agronomy, Inc.