About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Members of ASA, CSSA, and SSSA: Due to system upgrades, your subscriptions in the digital library will be unavailable from May 15th to May 22nd. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause, and thank you for your patience. If you have any questions, please call our membership department at 608-273-8080.

 

Institutional Subscribers: Institutional subscription access will not be interrupted for existing subscribers who have access via IP authentication, though new subscriptions or changes will not be available during the upgrade period. For questions, please email us at: queries@dl.sciencesocieties.org or call Danielle Lynch: 608-268-4976.

Abstract

 

This article in AJ

  1. Vol. 60 No. 4, p. 333-336
     
    Received: Nov 21, 1967


 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
Request Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2134/agronj1968.00021962006000040001x

Two Beta Sources Compared for Evaluating Water Status of Plants1

  1. D. E. Rolston and
  2. M. L. Horton2

Abstract

Abstract

Two sources of beta radiation, carbon-14 (C14) and promethium-147 (Pm147), were investigated for determination of leaf water content of three plant species over a range of water stress conditions. The plant species used were soybean (Glycine max L.), sorghum (Sorghum vulgare L.), and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Results obtained with both sources gave high correlations of relative turgidity with attenuated radiation. However, for relative turgidities above 60% in the plants studied, higher correlation coefficients were obtained using the C14 source. Results indicated that the C14 method appeared to be more sensitive to small changes in relative turgidity than was the Pm147 method. Leaf disc sections taken from sorghum and barley leaves gave more uniform response to water stress changes than did whole leaves.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © .