About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Abstract

 

This article in AJ

  1. Vol. 64 No. 4, p. 506-508
     
    Received: Nov 6, 1971
    Published: July, 1972


 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2134/agronj1972.00021962006400040029x

Influence of Nitrogen Source and Rate on Growth of Spring Grain and Soil pH1

  1. J. Alessi and
  2. J. F. Powers2

Abstract

Abstract

The effect of five N sources upon spring grain production was studied on Temvik silt loam for 4 years at Mandan, N. Dak., and residual responses were followed for 4 more years. The five sources—ammonium nitrate, ammonium sulfate, calcium nitrate, Uramite, and Nitroform (urea-formaldehyde)—were applied at rates of O, 34, and 68 kg N/ha to spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) or barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Results suggest that neither the rates of fertilization studied nor the interaction of N carrier × N rate were important in the production of total plant dry weight or grain yield. Small grain production was significantly altered by N source in only one of the fertilization years. Cumulative grain yields for 1960-1963 were significantly increased by fertilization with nitrate and ammonium sources. Grain yields for the 8-year period were significantly higher for ammonium and nitrate sources than for urea-formaldehyde sources. Residual effects from urea-formaldehyde fertilization were less effective for grain production than residual effects from nitrate and ammonium N carriers. Although ammonium sulphate lowered pH during the fertilization period, grain development was not seriously affected by this acidification. Cumulative grain production for the 8 years was 10,000 kg/ha with no N, 12,470 kg/ha with nitrate ammonium carriers, and 11,530 kg/ha with urea-formaldehyde sources.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © .