About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions

Agronomy Journal Abstract -

Soybean Leaf N as Influenced by Seedbed Preparation Methods and Stages of Growth1


This article in AJ

  1. Vol. 71 No. 4, p. 568-573
    Received: June 26, 1978

Request Permissions

  1. J. K. Young,
  2. F. D. Whisler and
  3. H. F. Hodges2



Recent interest and studies on nitrogen relationships in soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] have led to a better understanding of the processes regarding N accumulation during vegetative growth and remobilization during seed development. Most of the research work was performed with different N fertilizer treatments and isolines of nodulating and nonnodulating soybeans. Differences in cultural practices which modify the root environment and differences in soybean cultivar have not received much attention in N accumulation and remobilization studies. The objectives of this work are 1) To determine the effect of tillage treatments and cultivar on leaf N levels and 2) to develop a regression equation relating several plant and cultural variables to leaf N levels.

‘Forrest’ and ‘Tracy’ cultivars of soybeans were planted on Houston silty clay (very fine montmorillonitic, thermic family of Typic chromuderts) with seven different seedbed preparation methods and assayed for leaf N using the Kjeldhal method. Leaf N concentrations of the two cultivars showed similar patterns of change over the sampling period at each of three positions (top, middle, bottom) on the plant. Tracy had higher leaf N concentrations (5.3 to 3.2%) than Forrest (5.0 to 2.9%) throughout the growing season. Topleaf N remained fairly constant until late R2 maturity stage, after which it decreased rapidly. Middle-leaf N varied as a quadratic function of plant age. An inverse relationship between lower-leaf N and plant age was observed. For different cultivars, tillage affected leaf N within each leaf position in the early growing season. A regression model having factors of plant age, cultivar, leaf position and interactions of these factors predicted leaf N with a standard error of estimate of 0.33% and a coefficient of variation (R2) of 0.85.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © .