About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Abstract

 

This article in AJ

  1. Vol. 80 No. 5, p. 712-718
     
    Received: Feb 10, 1987


    * Corresponding author(s):
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
Request Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2134/agronj1988.00021962008000050003x

An Investigation of the Validity and Usefulness of Trend Analysis for Field Plot Data

  1. Roy N. Tamura ,
  2. Larry A. Nelson and
  3. George C. Naderman
  1. E li Lilly & Company, P.O. Box 708, Greenfield, IN 46140
    D ep. of Statistics, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-8203
    D ep. of Soil Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7619.

Abstract

Abstract

Blocking is sometimes ineffective in accounting for a field's systematic, spatial variation. In such cases, trend analysis has been proposed as an alternative method. This procedure fits a polynomial regression function (surface model) to account for some of the systematic variability. Computer simulated data were used to test the statistical validity of trend analysis. Data simulation facilitated this evaluation, because the experimental conditions of treatment variation, systematic variation, and random variation could be computer generated within prescribed limits. The validity of the significance levels in trend analysis was evaluated. Also, trend analysis was compared to the randomized complete-block analysis with regard to power of test and estimation of treatment effect. These studies show that with proper restrictions on choosing the surface model, trend analysis has true significance levels close to assumed levels. In addition, trend analysis was often superior to the randomized block analysis in power, and offered less biased estimates of treatment effects, especially when the pattern of systemic variation was complex and curvilinear.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © .