About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Abstract

 

This article in AJ

  1. Vol. 82 No. 1, p. 95-97
     
    Received: Feb 10, 1989


    * Corresponding author(s):
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
Request Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2134/agronj1990.00021962008200010022x

Spring Wheat Response to Herbicides Applied at Three Growth Stages

  1. Duane A. Martin,
  2. Stephen D. Miller  and
  3. Harold P. Alley
  1. American Cyanamid, Evansville, IN 47715

Abstract

Abstract

Since the inception of 2,4-D [(2,4-dichlorophenoxy) acetic acid], many herbicides have been developed for broadleaf weed control in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). However, many of these herbicides have not been thoroughly evaluated with respect to application timing and effects on wheat yield and quality. Field studies were conducted at Torrington, WY on a Bayard fine sandy loam (coarse loamy, mixed, mesic Torriothentic Haplustoll) in 1984 and 1985 to evaluate the response of ‘Oslo’ spring wheat to 10 broadleaf herbicide treatments applied at three growth stages. Dicamba (3,6-dichloro-2-methoxybenzoic acid), dicamba plus 2,4-D and dicamba plus MCPA [(4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy)acetic acid] reduced wheat yield 28, 21 and 24%, reduced kernels per spike 27, 33 and 21%, and increased seed protein 8, 10 and 13%, respectively, when applied at Zadoks Stage 44 (mid-boot). Several other auxin herbicides increased seed protein content, particularly when applied at Zadoks Stage 44. Proline and lysine content were not influenced by herbicide treatment at any stage of application. Spring wheat tolerance to bromoxynil (3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxybenzonitrile), chlorsulfuron (2-chloro-Ar-[[4-methoxy-6-methyl-l,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino]carbonyl] benzenesulfonamide} and MCPA was excellent regardless of growth stage at application.

Published with the approval of the Wyoming Agric. Exp. Stn. as Journal Article 1510.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © .