About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Abstract

 

This article in AJ

  1. Vol. 82 No. 1, p. 164-166
     
    Received: Feb 29, 1989


    * Corresponding author(s):
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
Request Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2134/agronj1990.00021962008200010036x

Influence of Sample Dividing Method on Forage Quality as Determined by Nirs

  1. M. H. Hall 
  1. Dep. of Plant, Soil and Entomological Science, Univ. Idaho, Moscow, ID 83843

Abstract

Abstract

Forage samples collected in the field are normally dried, coarsely ground, and subdivided to minimize time and expense required for secondary grinding, facilitate ease of sample handling, and reduce space needed for sample storage. The objective of this research was to determine the efficacy of four sample dividing methods to produce uniform subsamples for near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) analysis. Sample dividing methods were: (1) quarter sectioning with a straight edge, (2) use of a gravimetric dividing apparatus, (3) mixing in a blender then dividing by quarter sectioning, and (4) mixing in a blender and dividing with a gravimetric dividing apparatus. Dividing method efficacy was evaluated by comparison of subsample quality. Average coefficients of correlation (r) between subsamples obtained using the divider apparatus were 0.97 and 0.08 for crude protein (CP) and acid detergent fiber (ADF), respectively. These r values were 4 and 6% higher for CP and ADF, respectively, than those obtained using the quarter sectioning method. However, r of the quarter sectioning method averaged for both CP and ADF improved nearly 7% by mixing the sample before dividing. The gravimetric dividing apparatus was superior to the quarter sectioning method in uniformly dividing both mixed and unmixed forage samples.

Idaho Exp. Stn. Res. Paper no. 89-78.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © .