About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Abstract

 

This article in AJ

  1. Vol. 82 No. 4, p. 737-744
     
    Received: Feb 6, 1989


    * Corresponding author(s):
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
Request Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2134/agronj1990.00021962008200040018x

Herbage Production: Conventional Mixtures vs. Alternating Strips of Grass and Legume

  1. N.A. Fairey  and
  2. L.P. Lefkovitch
  1. A gric. Can. Res. Stn., P.O. Box 29, Beaverlodge, Alberta, T0H 0C0Canada
    A gric. Can., Res. Branch, Engineering and Statistical Res. Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0C6Canada

Abstract

Abstract

Soil N influences the agronomic characteristics of grass-legume herbage. A conventional grass-legume stand was compared for productivity, quality, and botanical composition, at two locations for three production years, to three stands comprised of alternating, broadcast-seeded strips (40-, 60-, or 80-cm width) of pure grass and pure legume. Stands were of smooth bromegrass (Bromus inermis Leyss.) and alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), and were grown under three N fertilizer treatments: N0 = no N, NGL = 150 kg ha−1 N applied uniformly to grass and legume; and NG = 150 kg ha−1 N but with the distribution of N restricted to plot areas seeded to grass. Grass dry matter (DM) yield declined as strip width increased with N0 (1.80-0.92 t ha−1) and NGL (3.67−2.56 t ha−1), but was unaffected by strip width with NG (3.60 t ha−1). Herbage DM digestibility was 698, 699, and 708 g kg−1 for the 40-, 60-, and 80-cm strip-culture stands, respectively, and 690 g kg1 for the conventional mixture. Legume concentration in harvested herbage (DM basis) ranged from 726 to 798, 489 to 524, and 411 to 426 g kg−1 for the strip-culture stands with N0, NGL, and NG, respectively; it was 658 and 375 g kg−1 for the conventional mixture with N0 and NGL, respectively. Stripculture stands have potential for manipulating grass/legume ratios of herbage, and may provide a way to supply optimal N fertilizer to grass plants in grass-legume associations, without relinquishing the N-fixing contribution of the legume.

Agriculture Canada, Research Branch Contribution nos. BRS88-11 and ESRC C-009, respectively.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © .