About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Abstract

 

This article in AJ

  1. Vol. 83 No. 4, p. 744-753
     
    Received: Feb 19, 1990


    * Corresponding author(s):
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2134/agronj1991.00021962008300040019x

Soil and Canopy Energy Balamces of a Row Crop at Partial Cover

  1. J. M. Ham ,
  2. J. L. Heilman and
  3. R. J. Lascano
  1. D ep. of Agronomy, Throckmorton Hall, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS 66506
    D ep. of Soil and Crop Sci., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843
    T exas Agric. Exp. Stn., Lubbock, TX 79401.

Abstract

Abstract

When crops are grown in a row configuration, heat and mass transfer within the soil-camopy system influence the energy and water balance of the crop. Field experiments were conaucted near Lubbock, TX, to examine the energy balance of the soil and canopy separately, in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) nnder a variety of aerial and soil moisture conditions. Bowen ratio techniques were used to obtain the field energy balance, including total latent heat flux (LES). Latent heat flux from the crop canopy (LEC was determined from sap flow measurements of transpiration. Latent heat flux from the soil (LES) was computed as the daerence between LE and LEC. These measurements were coupled with radiation measurements at the soil surface to partition the energy balance into soil and canopy components every 12 min throughout the day. Results indicate that detailed measurements of energy exchange within the soilcanopy-atmosphere system can be obtained without making simplifying assumptions about energy transfer. Daily energy balances were strongly influenced by sensible heat transport, and the radiation balance alone did not account for the magnitude or diurnal pattern of LES and LEC. When the soil surface was dry, the canopy simultaneously absorbed sensible heat originating from the soil and above-canopy air, accounting for more than 21 and 12% of LEC respectively. After an irrigation, LES accounted for more than 50% of LES even when the leaf area index was greater than two, and 11 to 21% of daily LEC occurred at night. The soil surface absorbed sensible heat from the canopy after irrigation, which increased LE1 while decreasing LEC. Analysis indicates that within-canopy radiative and convective energy transfer must be considered to accurately characterize LES and LEC in row crops during periods of partial cover.

Technical article TA25416 from the Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., College Station, TX 77843.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © .