About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Abstract

 

This article in AJ

  1. Vol. 85 No. 2, p. 388-395
     
    Received: May 21, 1991


    * Corresponding author(s):
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
Request Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2134/agronj1993.00021962008500020040x

A Crop-Specific Drought Index for Corn: I. Model Development and Validation

  1. Steven J. Meyer ,
  2. Kenneth G. Hubbard and
  3. Donald A. Wilhite
  1. Dep. of Agricultural Meteorology, Inst. of Agric. and Natural Res., Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE. 68583-0728

Abstract

Abstract

Most popular indices in use today that address agricultural drought [e.g., the Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) and the Crop Moisture Index (CMI)J do not consider specific crop responses to the drought event. Thus, values produced by indices such as the PDSI and CMI cannot be directly linked to drought impacts on crop production and yield since each crop responds differently to moisture and heat stress. This paper presents a new drought index that, unlike other drought indices, is specific to a single crop (corn—Zea mays L.) and takes into consideration water use during specific periods of growth. The Crop-Specific Drought Index (CSDI) model was developed with 8 yr of data from Nebraska's East Central Crop Reporting District (CRD), and validated with 10 yr of data from Nebraska's East Central CRD, 9 yr of data from Missouri's Northeast CRD, 8 yr of data from Wisconsin's South Central CRD, and 9 yr of data from Indiana's Central CRD. Plots of model predicted vs. actual CSDI values yielded coefficients of determination (r2) ranging from 0.32 (Central Indiana) to 0.76 (Northeast Missouri); D-index of agreement values ranging from 0.72 (Central Indiana) to 0.90 (South Central Wisconsin); and root mean square errors ranging from 7.7% (South Central Wisconsin) to 13.4% (Northeast Missouri). The CSDI model may provide an effective drought monitoring and assessment tool for the Corn Belt of the United States.

Published as Paper no. 9561, Journal Series, Nebraska Agricultural Research Division. The work reported here was conducted under Nebraska Agric. Res. Div. Project 27-005.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © .