About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Members of ASA, CSSA, and SSSA: Due to system upgrades, your subscriptions in the digital library will be unavailable from May 15th to May 22nd. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause, and thank you for your patience. If you have any questions, please call our membership department at 608-273-8080.

 

Institutional Subscribers: Institutional subscription access will not be interrupted for existing subscribers who have access via IP authentication, though new subscriptions or changes will not be available during the upgrade period. For questions, please email us at: queries@dl.sciencesocieties.org or call Danielle Lynch: 608-268-4976.

Abstract

 

This article in AJ

  1. Vol. 85 No. 3, p. 686-691
     
    Received: Feb 26, 1992


    * Corresponding author(s):
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
Request Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2134/agronj1993.00021962008500030031x

Water Use, Intercepted Radiation, and Soil Temperature of Skip-Row and Equidistant-Row Barley

  1. B. S. Sharratt 
  1. USDA-ARS, Subarctic Agric, Res. Unit, 309 O'Neill, UAF, Fairbanks, AK.

Abstract

Abstract

Cropping systems are sought in the subarctic that improve the plant growing environment for sustained and diversified production of crops. This study assessed whether microclimate and water use of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) could be altered in the subarctic by crop row configuration and fertilizer placement. Treatments established at Fairbanks, AK, included equidistant-row planting (0.18-m equidistant rows) with N banded between alternate rows or broadcast, and skiprow planting (skipping every third row of equidistant rows) with N banded between the closely spaced rows or broadcast. Crop water use, net and reflected radiation, interception of photon flux density (PFD), and soil temperatures were monitored during 1987 through 1989. Banding N resulted in a higher water-use efficiency (WUE) than did broadcasting N in 1989 but not 1988. Seasonal water use was equal among treatments, although higher leaf area index (LAI) for equidistant- row barley suggested less evaporation and greater transpiration than for skip-row barley. Equidistant-row barley intercepted 5% more PFD at heading, resulting in part from higher canopy reflectance. Skip-row barley, however, intercepted more PFD per unit leaf area. Midday net radiation was 3% higher and midday soil temperatures at 0.01 m in the interrow were as much as 5 °C higher for skip-row barley. In this subarctic environment, barley grown in equidistant rows appeared to utilize water more effectively in transpirational processes and to intercept more PFD for improving production efficiency compared to skip-row planting.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © .