About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions

Members of ASA, CSSA, and SSSA: Due to system upgrades, your subscriptions in the digital library will be unavailable from May 15th to May 22nd. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause, and thank you for your patience. If you have any questions, please call our membership department at 608-273-8080.


Institutional Subscribers: Institutional subscription access will not be interrupted for existing subscribers who have access via IP authentication, though new subscriptions or changes will not be available during the upgrade period. For questions, please email us at: queries@dl.sciencesocieties.org or call Danielle Lynch: 608-268-4976.



This article in AJ

  1. Vol. 85 No. 6, p. 1210-1217
    Received: Jan 31, 1991

    * Corresponding author(s):
Request Permissions


Crop Water Stress Index Models for Bermudagrass Turf: A Comparison

  1. H. R. Jalali-Farahani,
  2. Donald C. Slack ,
  3. David M. Kopec and
  4. Allan D. Matthias
  1. U SDA-ARS, S, Fort Collins, CO 80522
    D ep. of Agric. and Biosystems Engineering, Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721.
    D ep. of Plant Science, The Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721
    D ep. of Soil and Water Science, The Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721.



A field study assessed the accuracy and consistency of crop water stress index (CWSI) estimates determined by two empirical models and one theoretical model for evaluation of bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. cv. Midiron] water status. The simplest empirical model, describing canopy temperature minus air temperature (Tc — Ta) of well-watered turf as a linear function of air vapor pressure deficit, was inadequate for estimating CWSI, since seasonal averages of CWSI for well-watered, moderately stressed, and stressed turf had corresponding coefficients of variation of 1170, 160, and 86, respectively. The CWSI values were also highly influenced by net radiation, as indicated by coefficients of determination for regressions of calculated CWSI on net radiation of 0.68, 0.76, and 0.33 for the three levels of irrigation treatments, respectively. The second empirical model included net radiation in the regression analysis of Tc — Ta. The inclusion of net radiation in the equation for the unstressed baseline increased the coefficient of determination from 0.76 to 0.90 as compared with Model 1. The coefficient of determination for the upper baseline (which included net radiation) was 0.872, indicating a strong dependency of CWSI on net radiation. The theoretical CWSI model yielded the most accurate estimates of turfgrass water stress, as indicated by coefficients of variation for seasonal averages of CWSI for well-watered, moderately stressed, and stressed turf of 76, 3, and 86, respectively. Midday estimates of CWSI were related to percent available extractable water, with coefficients of determination for a regression of midday CWSI on percent available extractable water of 0.988, 0.989, and 0.991 for the empirical, modified empirical, and theoretical models, respectively. The theoretical CWSI appears to be the most promising approach for a turfgrass crop water stress index for irrigation scheduling.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © .