About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Abstract

 

This article in AJ

  1. Vol. 86 No. 1, p. 1-6
     
    Received: Sept 18, 1992


    * Corresponding author(s):
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
Request Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2134/agronj1994.00021962008600010001x

Crop Rotation and Tillage Effects on Soil Water and Cotton Yield

  1. J. P. Bordovsky,
  2. W. M. Lyle  and
  3. J. W. Keeling
  1. Texas A&M Agric. Res. & Ext. Ctr., Route 1, Box 219, Lubbock, TX 79401-9757

Abstract

Abstract

The Texas Southern High Plains is a major cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) producing area wherea monoculture of conventionally tilled continuous cotton is thought to be causing a downward trend in yields. A factorial experiment with split plot design evaluated the main and interactive effects of (i) cotton-wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)-fallow rotation vs. continuous cotton, (ii) no tillage vs. conventional tillage, and (iii) furrow diking vs. no diking on cotton yield and soil water. Effects were determined for both dryland and irrigated production. Of the main factors considered, the cotton-wheat rotation had the greatest positive effect on yield and also on soil water variables. Rotation increased dryland and irrigated lint yields 12.6 and 12.8%, respectively. No tillage significantly increased yields (6.9 and 5.5% for dryland and irrigated, respectively) and enhanced seasonal soil water status. Yield increase due to diking was not statistically significant (P > 0.05) under continuous cotton production or when wheat was rotated with cotton. The greatest cotton lint yield and soil water increases were obtained when no tillage was combined with the cotton wheat rotation (20–25% increases). Percent yield increase was directly associated with improved soil water relations resulting from the cropping and tillage treatments.

ontribution of the Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. Received 18 Sept. 1992.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © .