About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Abstract

 

This article in AJ

  1. Vol. 86 No. 2, p. 238-243
     
    Received: Mar 11, 1993


    * Corresponding author(s):
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2134/agronj1994.00021962008600020005x

Rye Residue Geometry for Faster Corn Development

  1. M.-C. Fortin  and
  2. A. S. Hamill
  1. A gric. Canada Res. Branch, Centre for Biol. and Land Resour. Res., 6660 N.W. Marine Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1X2
    A gric. Canada Res. Branch,Harrow, ON, Canada NOR 1G0.

Abstract

Abstract

Winter cereals used as cover crops in corn (Zea mays L.) production physically modify the soil-plant environment. Springtime killing of the cover crops with herbicides leaves surface residues either standing, flat, or a combination of the two at corn planting. This study was conducted to verify how standing rye (Secale cereale L.) residue affected soil temperature, soil water, and corn development compared with flat rye residue in a sandy loam in Harrow, ON, in 1990, 1991, and 1992. In the 3 yr, volumetric soil water content was similar in both treatments, but seed zone daily maximum temperatures were higher under standing than under flat residue. Corn development in standing residue was faster (2 to 3 d) compared with flat residue, except if seed zone maximum temperatures were regularly in the 28 to 32° range for both treatments, such as in 1991. During vegetative stages in 1990 and 1992, plants in the standing residue were taller than plants in the flat residue. Most of these height differences were related to differences in development that were related to soil temperature. In 1991, however, which was a hot and dry year, phyllochron values indicate that developmental rates under both treatments were affected by a factor other than temperature, most likely by a lack of soil water. In 2 of 3 yr, when seed zone temperatures were often below the optimal range for corn development, standing rye residue resulted in faster plant development than flat rye residue due to a warmer seed zone. Residue treatments did not affect yield.

Contribution from Agric. Canada Centre for Biol. and Land Resour. Res. (No. 93-13) and Harrow Res. Stn.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © .