About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Abstract

 

This article in AJ

  1. Vol. 88 No. 1, p. 85-89
     
    Received: May 1, 1995


    * Corresponding author(s): gcuomo@lsuvm.sncc.lsu.edu
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
Request Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2134/agronj1996.00021962008800010018x

Plant Morphology and Forage Nutritive Value of Three Bahiagrasses as Affected by Harvest Frequency

  1. G. J. Cuomo ,
  2. D. C. Blouin,
  3. D. L. Corkern,
  4. J. E. McCoy and
  5. R. Walz
  1. L ouisiana State Univ. Agric. Ctr., Southeast Res. Stn., P.O. Drawer 567, Franklinton, LA 70438
    D ep. of Experimental Statistics, Louisiana State Univ., 45 Agric. Admin. Bldg., Baton Rouge, LA 70803

Abstract

Abstract

Differences in morphological development have been reported among bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum Flμgge) cultivars. Relationships of harvest management to these developmental differences and subsequent forage production and nutritive value have not been characterized. A 2-yr study was initiated by harvesting ‘Argentine’, ‘Pensacola’, and ‘Tifton 9’ bahiagrass every 20, 30, or 40 d from mid-May until mid-September. Objectives were to determine if differences exist among these cultivars for leafiness, morphological development, forage mass, and forage nutritive value, and to determine if differences were affected by harvest frequency and season of growth. Leaf pereentage by weight, inflorescence development, forage nutritive value, and forage mass were evaluated for monocultures of the three cultivars. Argentine had a greater (P 0.01) percent leaf (87.2%) than did Pensacola (80.4%) or Tifton 9 (81.0%). In addition, Argentine and Tifton 9 produced fewer (P = 0.01) inflorescences at 20- and 30-d harvest frequencies than did Pensacola. Leaf percentage was greater (P = 0.01) at 20- (88.7%) than at 30- (78.6%) and 40-d (81.4%) harvest frequencies. There were cultivar × plant part interactions (P < 0.05) for neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and lignin, but differences were detected only in the stem component. No differences (P ≤ 0,05) wered etected amoncgu ltivars for other nutritive value variables. Total forage massw as similar (P ≤ 0.05) among cultivars. Differences in forage mass were detected (P = 0.01) only at the first harvest, where Argentine produced less forage (1.9 Mg ha−1) than Pensacola (3.1 Mg ha−1) or Tifton 9 (2.9 Mg ha−1). The combination of greater leaf percentage and fewer infiorescences indicate that Argentine could have potential advantages as a forage over other bahiagrass cultivars.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © .