About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions

Members of ASA, CSSA, and SSSA: Due to system upgrades, your subscriptions in the digital library will be unavailable from May 15th to May 22nd. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause, and thank you for your patience. If you have any questions, please call our membership department at 608-273-8080.


Institutional Subscribers: Institutional subscription access will not be interrupted for existing subscribers who have access via IP authentication, though new subscriptions or changes will not be available during the upgrade period. For questions, please email us at: queries@dl.sciencesocieties.org or call Danielle Lynch: 608-268-4976.



This article in AJ

  1. Vol. 89 No. 5, p. 718-723
    Received: Sept 8, 1995

    * Corresponding author(s): piepho@wiz.uni-kassel.de
Request Permissions


Analysis of a Randomized Block Design with Unequal Subclass Numbers

  1. Hans-Peter Piepho 
  1. Faculty of Agriculture, Univ. of Kassel, Steinstrasse 19, 37213 Witzenhausen, Germany



For some types of agricultural experiments, there are many observations per experimental unit; i.e., the subclass number is greater than one. In this article, the focus is on the randomized complete block design. Practitioners are often faced with unequal subclass numbers due to unpredicted experimental problems. The present paper discusses the statistical analysis of such unbalanced data, where subclass numbers vary independently of treatment variables and the response variable is not influenced by subclass number. In an example using the SAS statistical package to analyze data from a randomized complete block greenhouse experiment, an analysis of cell means compared favorably with a more elaborate Satterthwaite method. Monte Carlo simulations yielded similar results for both methods. It is concluded that, in practice, the cell means analysis is preferable for its simplicity.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © .