About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Agronomy Journal Abstract - MODELING

Timothy Yield and Nutritive Value by the CATIMO Model

 

This article in AJ

  1. Vol. 94 No. 2, p. 345-350
     
    Received: Dec 4, 2000


    * Corresponding author(s): belangergf@em.agr.ca
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
Request Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2134/agronj2002.3450
  1. Helge Bonesmoa and
  2. Gilles Bélanger *b
  1. a Norwegian Crop Res. Inst., Kvithamar Res. Cent., NO-7500 Stjordal, Norway
    b Soils and Crops Res. and Dev. Cent., Agric. and Agri-Food Can., 2560 Hochelaga Blvd., Sainte-Foy, QC, Canada G1V 2J3

Abstract

Growth and nutritive value of forage crops have rarely been integrated into one mechanistic computer simulation model. In a companion paper, we described the growth and N concentration modules of an integrated model of timothy (Phleum pratense L.) primary growth and nutritive value, known as CATIMO (Canadian Timothy Model). In this paper, we describe the digestibility module, which features the cell wall (CW) digestibility and CW concentration for each of the plant morphological components derived from the growth module of the model. The model parameters were calibrated to key model attributes: concentration and digestibility of CW in leaves, stems, and forage and dry matter (DM) digestibility of leaves, stems, and forage. Calibration measurements were taken weekly on timothy primary growth in four different years at one location (Fredericton, NB, Canada). The model satisfactorily fitted the measured values with root mean square errors of estimation (RMSE) of 0.051 g g−1 DM for forage CW concentration, 0.026 g g−1 CW for forage CW digestibility, and 0.018 g g−1 DM for forage DM digestibility. The leaf and stem CW concentration (RMSE ≤ 0.044 g g−1 DM), CW digestibility (RMSE ≤ 0.019 g g−1 CW), and DM digestibility (RMSE ≤ 0.018 g g−1 DM) were also calculated satisfactorily by the model. The CATIMO model is a promising tool because of its mechanistic and flexible approach and the good agreement between measured and simulated values.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2002. American Society of AgronomyPublished in Agron. J.94:345–350.