About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions

Members of ASA, CSSA, and SSSA: Due to system upgrades, your subscriptions in the digital library will be unavailable from May 15th to May 22nd. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause, and thank you for your patience. If you have any questions, please call our membership department at 608-273-8080.


Institutional Subscribers: Institutional subscription access will not be interrupted for existing subscribers who have access via IP authentication, though new subscriptions or changes will not be available during the upgrade period. For questions, please email us at: queries@dl.sciencesocieties.org or call Danielle Lynch: 608-268-4976.



This article in AJ

  1. Vol. 96 No. 1, p. 154-158
    Received: Jan 6, 2003

    * Corresponding author(s): dlyoung@wsu.edu
Request Permissions


Economics of Alternative No-Till Spring Crop Rotations in Washington's Wheat–Fallow Region

  1. Louis A. Juergensa,
  2. Douglas L. Young *a,
  3. William F. Schillingerb and
  4. Herbert R. Hinmana
  1. a Dep. of Agric. and Resour. Econ., Hulbert Hall 101, Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA 99164-6210
    b Dep. of Crop and Soil Sci., Washington State Univ., Dryland Res. Stn., Lind, WA 99341


Winter wheat [Triticum aestivum L.] (WW)–summer fallow (SF) is the dominant cropping system in the low-precipitation (<300 mm annual) region of the inland Pacific Northwest (PNW), USA. Intensive tillage during SF often leaves soil vulnerable to wind erosion. While no-till cropping is well known for wind erosion control benefits, previous research in the inland PNW showed that annual no-till hard red spring wheat (HRSW) trailed WW–SF in profitability by $113 ha−1 yr−1 Our objective was to assess the agronomic and economic feasibility of alternative no-till spring grain and oilseed rotations in a 5-yr experiment near Ritzville, WA. Spring crops were soft white wheat (SW), barley [Hordeum vulgare L.] (SB) yellow mustard [Brassica hirta Moench] (YM), and safflower [Carthamus tinctorius L.] (SAF) grown in three rotation sequences. Net returns from WW–SF on 10 neighboring farms during the 5-yr period averaged $21.52 ha−1 yr−1 The most profitable no-till spring cropping sequence was continuous SW, which averaged net returns of $12.11 ha−1 yr−1, equivalent to WW–SF and much more competitive than previous HRSW results. No-till SW–SB and a 4-yr rotation of SAF–YM–SW–SW averaged −$12.10 and −$31.45 ha−1 yr−1, respectively. Although all no-till spring crop rotations had higher annual income variability than WW–SF, positive net returns for continuous SW is the first economic good news for continuous annual cropping using no-till in the low-precipitation region of the inland PNW.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2004. American Society of AgronomyAmerican Society of Agronomy