About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Members of ASA, CSSA, and SSSA: Due to system upgrades, your subscriptions in the digital library will be unavailable from May 15th to May 22nd. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause, and thank you for your patience. If you have any questions, please call our membership department at 608-273-8080.

 

Institutional Subscribers: Institutional subscription access will not be interrupted for existing subscribers who have access via IP authentication, though new subscriptions or changes will not be available during the upgrade period. For questions, please email us at: queries@dl.sciencesocieties.org or call Danielle Lynch: 608-268-4976.

Abstract

 

This article in AJ

  1. Vol. 96 No. 6, p. 1572-1580
     
    Received: Aug 25, 2003


    * Corresponding author(s): rkhosla@colostate.edu
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
Request Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2134/agronj2004.1572

Economic Feasibility of Variable-Rate Nitrogen Application Utilizing Site-Specific Management Zones

  1. B. Kocha,
  2. R. Khosla *a,
  3. W. M. Frasierb,
  4. D. G. Westfalla and
  5. D. Inmana
  1. a Dep. of Soil and Crop Sci., Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523
    b Dep. of Agric. and Resour. Econ., Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523

Abstract

Variable-rate technology (VRT) has been developed to variably apply crop inputs to manage in-field variability. Although growers have begun to adopt VRT, its profitability is uncertain in N management. The objective of this study was to assess the economics of uniform vs. variable-rate N fertilizer application under two N application scenarios (farmer vs. custom applications). On-farm studies were conducted on two continuous corn (Zea mays L.) fields in northeastern Colorado under furrow and center-pivot irrigation during the 2000 and 2001 growing seasons. The N management strategies were uniform, grid-based, site-specific management zone–constant yield goal (SSMZ-CYG) and site-specific management zone–variable yield goal (SSMZ-VYG). “Profit and loss” software was used to analyze the economics of each N management strategy and determine which N strategy was most profitable. Results from three site-years consistently indicated that less total N fertilizer (6–46%) was used with the SSMZ-VYG N management strategy when compared with uniform N management. Net returns from the SSMZ-VYG N management strategy were $18.21 to $29.57 ha−1 more than uniform N management. Results of this study suggest variable-rate N application utilizing site-specific management zones are more economically feasible than conventional uniform N application.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2004. American Society of AgronomyAmerican Society of Agronomy