doi:
- Ramdeo Seepaula,
- Bisoondat Macoon *b,
- K. Raja Reddyc and
- William B. Evansd
- a North Florida Research and Extension Center, Univ. of Florida, 155 Research Rd., Quincy, FL 32351
b E.G. (Gene) Morrison Brown Loam Branch Experiment Station, Mississippi State Univ., 1676 Brown Loam Rd., Raymond, MS 39154
c Dep. of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State Univ., R.R. Foil Plant Science Research Center, Bldg. 32, Mississippi State, MS 39762
d Truck Crops Branch Experiment Station, Mississippi State Univ., 2024 Experiment Station Rd., Crystal Springs, MS 39059
Abstract
Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) chemical composition dynamics must be evaluated if dual-purpose use as both forage and feedstock is to be considered. This 2-year study, conducted at the Brown Loam Branch Experiment Station, Raymond, MS, quantified first harvest timing (HT) and nitrogen (N) rate effects on forage nutritive value, feedstock chemical composition, and ethanol yield of both primary and aftermath harvests of ‘Alamo’ switchgrass. Treatments were factorial combinations of six HT (monthly intervals from May to October) and four N application rates (0, 35.7, 71.2, and 107.1 lb/acre) in a randomized complete block design. Aftermath was harvested in November. In both years, first harvest acid detergent fiber (ADF), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose concentrations of aboveground biomass, stems, and leaves increased with HT from May to October while aftermath harvest concentrations decreased with shorter regrowth after the first harvest. Stems had greater concentrations than leaf. Crude protein (CP) and in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) decreased with plant maturity and were greatest in the leaf component. Concentrations of major sugars increased with maturity and were greatest in the most mature stand in the aftermath. Ethanol yield was greatest in the least mature stands; however, ethanol production increased with maturity, largely because of greater biomass harvested. Nitrogen rate had no effect on forage nutritive value or feedstock composition in either the primary or aftermath harvests. These results provide information that can guide potential utilization of switchgrass as forage in early season and harvesting for biofuel feedstock at the end of the season.
Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.Copyright © 2016. . Copyright © 2016 by the American Society of Agronomy, Inc.

OPEN ACCESS
