About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management Abstract - Forage & Grazinglands

Grazing Evaluation of Annual and Perennial Cool-Season Forage Systems for Stocker Production in the Lower Transition Zone

 

This article in CFTM

  1. Vol. 3 No. 1
    unlockOPEN ACCESS
     
    Received: June 23, 2016
    Accepted: Nov 04, 2016
    Published: February 13, 2017


    * Corresponding author(s): jjtucker@uga.edu
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
Request Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2134/cftm2016.06.0048
  1. Robert W. Mckeea,
  2. Jennifer J. Tucker *b,
  3. M. Kimberly Mullenixc,
  4. Christopher Prevattd and
  5. Edzard van Santene
  1. a Graduate Research Assistant, Dep. of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, Auburn Univ., Auburn, AL 36849
    b Assistant Professor, Dep. of Animal and Dairy Sciences, Univ. of Georgia, Tifton, GA 31793
    c Assistant Professor, Dep. of Animal Science, Auburn Univ., Auburn, AL 36849
    d Regional Specialized Agent, Range Cattle REC, Univ. of Florida, Ona, FL 33865
    e Professor and Director, Agronomy Dep. and IFAS Statistical Consulting Unit, Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
Core Ideas:
  • A simultaneous grazing evaluation of perennial and annual cool-season forages was conducted in the Southeast.
  • A real-world evaluation used production practices common in the lower transition zone.
  • Cool-season forages can meet stocker nutritional needs and provide high-quality forage for grazing.
  • Novel endophyte tall fescue has greater long-term profit potential compared with these annual forages.

Abstract

Cool-season forages provide high-quality forage throughout the cooler months, which can reduce winter feed and hay consumption by extending the grazing season in the Southeast. Limited research has been conducted to simultaneously evaluate common annual and perennial cool-season forage options during this time period. A 2-year grazing trial was conducted to evaluate annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum L.), mixtures of cereal rye (Secale cereal L.) and annual ryegrass, and novel endophyte tall fescue [Lolium arundinaceum (Shreb.) Darbysh.] seeded with annual crimson clover (Trifolium incarnatum L.), perennial white clover (Trifolium repens L.), or treated with spring-applied N fertilizer. Parameters evaluated were timing and length of grazing season, forage nutritive value, forage dry matter (DM) availability, animal performance, and economic returns. Economic analysis evaluated monetary returns per acre. In Year 1 (2013–2014) annual treatments provided 68 days of grazing while perennial treatments provided 75 days. In Year 2 (2014–2015) mixtures of cereal rye and annual ryegrass provided 57 days, while annual ryegrass and novel endophyte tall fescue treatments provided 85 and 84 days, respectively. Animal average daily gain (ADG) and body weight (BW) gain/acre was greatest for ryegrass and tall fescue and least in treatments containing cereal rye. No differences in animal performance were observed between legume and N fertilizer within forage base. Novel endophyte tall fescue treatments had positive returns per acre compared with negative returns for annual treatments. These results indicate that under conditions of similar animal performance and forage production, novel endophyte tall fescue systems may provide a more economical option for producers in the lower transition zone of the Southeast.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2017. Copyright © 2017 by the American Society of Agronomy and Crop Science Society of America