About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Abstract

 

This article in CM

  1. Vol. 5 No. 1
     
    Published: July, 2006


    * Corresponding author(s): btillman@ifas.ufl.edu
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
 Share

doi:10.1094/CM-2006-0711-01-RS

Response of Peanut Cultivars to Seeding Density and Row Patterns

  1. B. L. Tillman *,
  2. D. W. Gorbeta,
  3. A. K. Culbreath and
  4. J. W. Toddb
  1. a North Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Marianna 32446
    b Coastal Plain Experiment Station, The University of Georgia, Tifton 31793

Abstract

Spotted wilt, caused by Tomato spotted wilt virus (genus Tospovirus; family Bunyaviridae) is a major disease of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in the southeastern United States. Research has shown that several management factors such as increased plant stands (seeding density) and twin-row planting pattern can help minimize losses from spotted wilt; however, the single most important factor is cultivar resistance. New cultivars with excellent spotted wilt resistance have been developed, and studies were conducted in Marianna, FL during 2001-2004 to evaluate their response to seeding density and twin-row vs. single-row planting patterns. Pod yields were greater and spotted wilt severity was lower in twin-row compared to single-row planting patterns, but there was no cultivar × row-pattern interaction. All cultivars, regardless of their level of resistance to spotted wilt benefit from being planted in twin-rows. No differences in yield or spotted wilt severity were noted among seeding density treatments of 5, 6, and 7 seed per linear foot in 2001-2004. However, in 2004, yield was reduced and spotted wilt increased at 4 compared to 5, 6, or 7 seeds per linear foot. These results indicate that twin-row planting patterns and seeding densities of 5 to 7 seeds per linear foot benefit peanut cultivars with at least intermediate resistance to spotted wilt.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2006. © 2006 Plant Management Network.