About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Members of ASA, CSSA, and SSSA: Due to system upgrades, your subscriptions in the digital library will be unavailable from May 15th to May 22nd. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause, and thank you for your patience. If you have any questions, please call our membership department at 608-273-8080.

 

Institutional Subscribers: Institutional subscription access will not be interrupted for existing subscribers who have access via IP authentication, though new subscriptions or changes will not be available during the upgrade period. For questions, please email us at: queries@dl.sciencesocieties.org or call Danielle Lynch: 608-268-4976.

Abstract

 

This article in CS

  1. Vol. 15 No. 3, p. 309-313
     
    Received: Oct 30, 1974


 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
Request Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2135/cropsci1975.0011183X001500030008x

Stomatal Size and Frequency in Soybeans1

  1. A. J. Ciha and
  2. W. A. Brun2

Abstract

Abstract

The stomatal frequency of 43 soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr. genotypes varied significantly. The mean frequency on the adaxial surface was 130 (range: 81 to 174); on the abaxial surface, it was 316 stomata/mm2 (range: 242 to 345). The mean guard cell lengths were 21.9 and 20.4 µ for the adaxial and abaxial surfaces, respectively.

Stomatal frequency and leaf area were measured on the terminal leaflet of the third trifoliolate of soybeans grown at 18, 24, and 30 C and at 19,300 and 32,300 lux. Stomatal frequency significantly decreased with temperature on the abaxial surface, but there was no effect on the adaxial surface. Stomatal frequency significantly increased with light intensity on both surfaces. Leaf area increased with temperature and decreased with light intensity. Stomatal number/leaflet did not vary significantly with light or temperature treatments.

Water-stressed, field-grown plants had significantly greater stomatal frequency and smaller leaf area than nonwater-stressed plants. Stomata/leaflet surface were significantly lower on water stressed plants than nonwater-stressed plants.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © .