About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Abstract

 

This article in CS

  1. Vol. 27 No. 3, p. 539-543
     
    Received: Aug 7, 1986


 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
Request Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2135/cropsci1987.0011183X002700030024x

Stomatal Closure vs. Osmotic Adjustment: a Comparison of Stress Response1

  1. Keith J. McCree and
  2. Steven G. Richardson2

Abstract

Abstract

A common response to water stress is stomatal closure, which reduces fluxes of both CO2 and water vapor. Alternatively, stomates may remain open while turgor is maintained through osmotic adjustment. The latter response should result in a greater C gain. To test this, daily whole plant C balances and water losses of cowpea plants (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) were compared with those of sugarbeet plants (Beta vulgaris L.) of equal leaf area. Under frequent irrigation and controlled environment conditions typical of warm, humid, sunny days, C gain and water-loss rates were almost identical in the two species. When irrigation was withheld, the sugarbeet plants adjusted osmotically by 0.8 kJ kg−1 (0.8 MPa, 8 bars) and reached a daytime minimum leaf water potential of −2.6 kJ kg−1 at the time of re-irrigation, while the cowpea plants adjusted by half as much but maintained a higher water potential (−1.2 kJ kg−1) by stomatal closure. At any given water potential, water-loss rates were much smaller in the cowpea plants, but on any given day, the rates were very similar in the two species. This was because the water potential fell much more rapidly in the sugarbeet plants. The C gain rates were also similar. The comparison of these two species showed little or no C gain advantage of osmotic adjustment over stomatal closure.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © .