About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Abstract

 

This article in CS

  1. Vol. 30 No. 1, p. 1-6
     
    Received: Dec 7, 1987


    * Corresponding author(s):
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
Request Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2135/cropsci1990.0011183X003000010001x

Sporophytic and Gametophytic Responses of Sugarbeet to Two Pathotoxins

  1. H. S. Moser,
  2. G. A. Smith  and
  3. S. S. Martin
  1. D ep. of Agronomy, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011
    U SDA-ARS, Northern Crop Science Lab., North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105
    U SDA-ARS, Crops Res. Lab., Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523

Abstract

Abstract

In vitro toxin sensitivity has been correlated with in vivo disease resistance for several crop species but little has been reported on the association between disease resistance of the sporophyte and pathotoxin sensitivity in the gametophyte. The objectives of this research were to study the response of the gametophytic and sporophytic generations to cercosporin (CN) and cercospora beticola toxin (CBT) and to determine toxin sensitivity of sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) lines with known levels of leaf spot resistance. Three sugarbeet lines having variedegrees of field resistance to Cercospora leaf spot were evaluated for sensitivity to two pathotoxins produced by the causal fungus, Cercospora beticola Sacc. The toxins, CN and CBT, were isolated and purified from cultures of the fungus, then applied singly or in varied combinations to leaf disks (sporophytic generation) or pollen (gametophytic generation). The CN CBT, separately or together, caused cellular leakage of Na and K in the sporophytic generation and potassium only in the gametophytic generation. This effect was toxin-concentration dependent, but without synergism. In the sporophytic generation, the least ion leakage response to either toxin occurred in leaf disks taken from the most disease resistant of the three lines evaluated. Gametophyticion leakage responses to the toxins also were significant, but these responses were not directly correlated with leaf disk ion leakage or with sporophytic field disease resistance. The techniques facilitated a controlled study of CN and CBT sensitivity in the sporophytic and gametophytic generations of sugarbeet.

Contribution in cooperation with the Dep. of Agronomy, Agric. Exp. Stn., Colorado State Univ.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 1990. Crop Science Society of America, Inc.Copyright © 1990 by the Crop Science Society of America, Inc.