About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Crop Science Abstract -

Predictors of Alfalfa Forage Quality: Validation with Field Data

 

This article in CS

  1. Vol. 32 No. 1, p. 245-250
     
    Received: Apr 25, 1991


 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
Request Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2135/cropsci1992.0011183X003200010049x
  1. Matt A. Sanderson
  1. Texas A&M Research and Ext., Ctr., Rt. 2 Box 00, Stephenville, TX7 6401

Abstract

Abstract

The mean stage system for describing alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) morphological development and quality has potential as a management tool. Published equations for predicting alfalfa leaf, stem, and herbage quality have not been tested widely. Study objectives were to (i) test published equations for predicting quality from mean stage weight (MSW) or count (MSC) or growing degree days (GDD, base = 5°C) with forage quality data for alfalfa stems, leaves, and herbage, and (ii) test a published equation for converting MSC values to MSW. Two published data sets from Iowa (n = 83 and1 6) and two unpublished data sets from Texas (n = 830 and 164) were used. Predicted values of neutral- and acid-detergent fiber (NDF and ADF), acid-detergent lignin (ADL), in vitro true digestibility (IVTD), and crude protein (CP) for leaves, stems, and herbage were regressed on observed values. In most instances, intercepts and slopes were significantly different from zero and one, respectively, for values from any predictor regressed on actual values, indicating that the prediction equations were biased; however, the prediction error frequently was less than the calibration error. Values of NDF and ADF in alfalfa stems predicted from GDD equations for actual values better than did predicted values from MSC and MSW equations for the Iowa data sets. For the Texas data sets, GDD was inaccurate and imprecise in predicting NDF or IVTD of herbage. Values of MSW predicted from MSC fit observed values well. Biases in the prediction equations indicate that calibration for specific geographic or environmental regions and frequent recalibration are necessary.

Approved for publication by the Director of the Texas Agricultural Experiment Station as paper TA-30062.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © .