About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Abstract

 

This article in CS

  1. Vol. 35 No. 6, p. 1566-1569
     
    Received: Feb 20, 1995


    * Corresponding author(s): agr038@ukcc.uky.edu
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
Request Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2135/cropsci1995.0011183X003500060008x

Inheritance of Tillering in a Winter Wheat Population

  1. David A. Van Sanford  and
  2. Herry Utomo
  1. D ep. of Agronomy, Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546-0091
    D ep. of Agronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803-2110

Abstract

Abstract

Tillers are an important component of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Thell.) grain yield, yet there is uncertainty in the literature about improving yield by selecting for tiller number. The objectives of this study were to estimate the heritability of tiller number, to quantify genotype × environment (G × E) interaction, and to assess tiller number as an indirect selection criterion. We measured tiller number at five growth stages, grain yield, and kernel size in 92 soft red winter wheat F4 lines in 1987 and in their bulk F5 progeny at two planting dates in 1988. Heritability (h2) of tiller number at Feekes growth stages 2, 4, 7, 10.1, and 11.2 in a single environment ranged from 0.05 to 0.60. When G × E interaction was accounted for in a combined analysis, however, heritability estimates were much lower, ranging from −0.14 to 0.19. Genotype rank changes were common among pairs of environments, though in certain cases, scale differences predominated. Tiller number at growth stage 10.1 was highly correlated with yield (r = 0.58, P < 0.01) and had higher heritability (h2 = 0.19) than yield (h2 = 0.05), and thus, we predict a higher response (36%) to indirect selection than to direct selection for yield itself. Indirect selection for tiller number with visual keys would be most appropriate in early generations when direct yield assessment is difficult, followed by direct selection for yield in later generations.

The investigation reported in this paper (94-3-47) is in connection with a project of the Kentucky Agric. Exp. Stn. and is published with the approval of the director.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © .