About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Abstract

 

This article in CS

  1. Vol. 39 No. 3, p. 719-724
     
    Received: Feb 17, 1998


    * Corresponding author(s): fadamsen@uswcl.ars.ag.gov
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
Request Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2135/cropsci1999.0011183X003900030019x

Measuring Wheat Senescence with a Digital Camera

  1. F. G. Adamsen ,
  2. Paul J. Pinter Jr.,
  3. Edward M. Barnes,
  4. Robert L. LaMorte,
  5. Gerard W. Wall,
  6. Steven W. Leavitt and
  7. Bruce A. Kimball
  1. U.S. Water Conservation Laboratory, USDA, ARS, 4331 E. Broadway Rd., Phoenix, AZ 85040

Abstract

Abstract

Documenting crop senescence rates is often difficult because of the need for frequent sampling during periods of rapid change and the subjective nature of human visual observations. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of using images produced by a digital camera to measure the senescence rate of wheat and to compare the results with changes in greenness determined by two established methods. Measurements were made as part of an experiment to determine the effects of elevated C02 and limited soil nitrogen on spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) at the University of Arizona's Maricopa Agricultural Center, near Phoenix, AZ. “Greenness” measurements were made during senescence of the crop with a color digital camera, a hand-held radiometer, and a SPAD chlorophyll meter. The green to red (GIR) for each pixel in an image was calculated and the average GIR computed for cropped images from a digital camera representing 1 m2 for each treatment and sample date. The normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) was calculated from the red and near-infrared canopy reflectances measured with a hand held radiometer. A SPAD reading was obtained from randomly selected flag leaves. All three methods of measuring plant greenness showed similar temporal trends. The relationships between GIR with NDVI and SPAD were linear over most of the range of G/R. However, NDVI was more sensitive at low values than G/R. GIR was more sensitive above GIR values of 1.2 than SPAD because the upper limits of SPAD measurements were constrained by the amount of chlorophyll in the leaf, while GIR responded to both chlorophyll concentration in the leaves as well as the number of leaves present. Color digital imaging appears useful for quantifying the senescence of crop canopies. The cost of color digital cameras is expected to decrease and the quality and convenience of use to improve.

This work was supported in part by grant #DE-FG03-95E-62072 from the U.S. Department of Energy. Terrestrial Carbon Processes Research Program. Trade names are included for the benefit of the reader, and imply no endorsement or preferential treatment of the products listed by the USDA.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © .