About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions



This article in CS

  1. Vol. 40 No. 2, p. 422-429
    Received: Feb 5, 1999

    * Corresponding author(s): belangergf@em.agr.ca
Request Permissions


Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Morphological Characteristics of Timothy Populations Selected for Low and High Forage Nitrogen Concentrations

  1. A. Brégarda,
  2. G. Bélanger *a and
  3. R. Michauda
  1.  aAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 2560 Hochelaga Bd., Sainte-Foy, QC, G1V 2J3, Canada. Contribution no. 639 Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada


Improving timothy (Phleum pratense L.) N use efficiency (NUE) through genetic selection aims at producing greater or similar forage dry matter (DM) yields with less N fertilizer while maintaining N concentration close to the optimal level required for ruminant nutrition. Two populations of timothy, arising from divergent selection for high (N+) and low (N−) forage N concentration, and a reference population, ‘Champ’, were studied under controlled conditions with N rates of 1, 5, 10, and 20 mg N plant−1 wk−1 The populations N− and Champ produced more forage DM yield than N+. This difference in forage production was the result of changes in biomass partitioning between shoots and roots because, at the whole plant level, no differences in total biomass (shoots + roots) were found. On the basis of total biomass, there were no population differences in NUE and N accumulation efficiency (NAE). For a given level of forage DM yield, N+ had a greater N accumulation than N− and Champ and, therefore, a greater N concentration. The greater forage N concentration of N+ was not due to a greater leaf N concentration but to a greater proportion of leaves. The population N+ also had a greater proportion of roots than N−. The forage insoluble N concentration of N+ was greater than that of N−, while NO3–N concentrations of the populations were similar. The population N+ had a greater tiller density and specific leaf area (SLA) than N−. Differences in forage DM yield and N concentration between two populations selected for low and high N concentrations were mainly due to the modification of C and N partitioning between shoots and roots, and between leaves and stems. Our results highlight the role of biomass partitioning in improving grass NUE or N concentration.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2000. Crop Science Society of AmericaCrop Science Society of America