About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions

Members of ASA, CSSA, and SSSA: Due to system upgrades, your subscriptions in the digital library will be unavailable from May 15th to May 22nd. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause, and thank you for your patience. If you have any questions, please call our membership department at 608-273-8080.


Institutional Subscribers: Institutional subscription access will not be interrupted for existing subscribers who have access via IP authentication, though new subscriptions or changes will not be available during the upgrade period. For questions, please email us at: queries@dl.sciencesocieties.org or call Danielle Lynch: 608-268-4976.



This article in CS

  1. Vol. 42 No. 3, p. 848-852
    Received: Mar 16, 2001

    * Corresponding author(s): rshearman1@unl.edu
Request Permissions


Kentucky Bluegrass Cultivar Root and Top Growth Responses When Grown in Hydroponics

  1. K. S. Erushaa,
  2. R. C. Shearman *b,
  3. T. P. Riordanb and
  4. L. A. Witb
  1. a United States Golf Association Green Section, P.O. Box 708, Far Hills, NJ 07931-0708
    b Dep. of Agronomy and Horticulture, 377 Plant Science, Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583-0724


The fine texture and fibrous nature of turfgrass root systems make it difficult, tedious, and time consuming to measure root production, distribution, and plasticity. Timely, labor-efficient methods for turfgrass root assessment would be helpful. The objectives of this study were to: (i) evaluate Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) cultivars and experimental lines for root production, depth, and distribution in hydroponics; (ii) determine ability to redistribute roots as solution levels decline; and (iii) assess production of clipping yield, verdure, and top growth. Fifteen Kentucky bluegrass cultivars and one experimental line were studied in hydroponics experiments. ‘Georgetown’ produced the most root mass at 1460 mg, while ‘Kenblue’ and NE 80-88 had the least production at 1122 and 1099 mg, respectively. Total root production varied by 25% among entries. Root production was greatest for all cultivars in the range of 0 to 300 mm, declining with depth, but all entries produced roots at depths >600 mm. NE 80-88 had 90% of its root growth in this range, while ‘Touchdown’ had 71%. Root production declined considerably at depths >450 mm. ‘Birka’, ‘Dormie’, ‘Eclipse’, and Touchdown had the greatest roots, while ‘Aspen’, Georgetown, NE 80-88, and ‘Park’ had the least. Touchdown had the most roots (i.e., 27% of root mass) remaining in the hydroponic solution at the end of each experiment, while NE 80-88 had the least at 8.7%. Total top growth varied among the Kentucky bluegrass cultivars by 42%. ‘America’ produced the most total top growth at 9.2 g, while Kenblue had the least at 5.4 g. Aspen produced the most clippings with a yield of 3.7 g, while ‘Challenger’ and Eclipse had the lowest production at 2.1 g. Results from these experiments indicate hydroponic systems can be used to effectively separate Kentucky bluegrass genotypes for rooting and top growth responses. Furthermore, these results support the potential to select Kentucky bluegrass genotypes with improved rooting characteristics, such as root distribution and plasticity. Additional research is needed to relate results developed from hydroponics studies with field conditions.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2002. Crop Science Society of AmericaPublished in Crop Sci.42:848–852.