About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions



This article in CS

  1. Vol. 47 No. 1, p. 399-415
    Received: Jan 19, 2006

    * Corresponding author(s): d.chapman@unimelb.edu.au
Request Permissions


Impacts of Spatial Patterns in Pasture on Animal Grazing Behavior, Intake, and Performance

  1. D. F. Chapman *a,
  2. A. J. Parsonsb,
  3. G. P. Cosgroveb,
  4. D. J. Barkerc,
  5. D. M. Marottiad,
  6. K. J. Venningae,
  7. S. M. Rutterf,
  8. J. Hilla and
  9. A. N. Thompsone
  1. a School of Agriculture and Food Systems, Univ. of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
    b AgResearch Grasslands, Private Bag 11008, Palmerston North, New Zealand
    c Dep. of Horticulture and Crop Science, Ohio State Univ., 2021 Coffey Rd., Columbus, OH 43210, USA
    d Meat and Livestock Australia, 165 Walker Street, North Sydney, NSW 2060, Australia
    e Primary Industries Research Victoria, Dep. of Primary Industries, Private Bag 105, Hamilton, Victoria 3300, Australia
    f Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, North Wyke, Okehampton, Devon, EX20 2SB, UK


Control over the quantity and quality of food ingested by grazing ruminants in temperate pasture systems remains elusive. This is due in part to the foraging choices that animals make when grazing from communities of mixed plant species. Grazing behavior and intake interact strongly with the feed supply–demand balance, pasture composition, and grazing method. These interactions are not completely understood, even for relatively simple pasture communities such as a perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.)–white clover (Trifolium repens L.) mixture. When offered a free choice between these species, ruminants exhibit a partial preference for clover compared to grass (about 0.7:0.3) and have a higher intake rate from clover but do not graze to maximize their daily intake of dry matter (DM). When monocultures of grass and clover are offered as a free choice in 50:50 area ratio, animal performance is no different than from a clover monoculture alone. Thus, all of the feeding value benefits of clover are available when only 0.5 of the grazing area is sown to clover. These observations accord with the satiety theory and imply that there are constraints to eating pure clover that animals can overcome by adding grass to their diet, provided their ability to locate and ingest each food is not seriously limited. The challenge for grassland management is to present feed to animals at pasture in ways that allow them to meet their dietary preferences, while also allowing high rates of animal production per hectare.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2007. Crop Science Society of AmericaCrop Science Society of America