About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Abstract

 

This article in CS

  1. Vol. 47 No. 5, p. 1859-1864
     
    Received: Dec 20, 2006


    * Corresponding author(s): scott.bradley.milligan@seminis.com
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
Request Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2135/cropsci2006.12.0822

Early Stage Sugarcane Selection Using Different Plot Sizes

  1. Scott B. Milligan *a,
  2. Monica Balzarinib,
  3. Kenneth A. Gravoisc and
  4. Keith P. Bischoffc
  1. a Seminis, P.O. Box 249, Felda, FL 33930
    b National Univ. of Cordoba, CC 509, 5000-Cordoba, Argentina
    c St. Gabriel Research Station, Louisiana State Univ. Agricultural Center, 5755 LSU Ag. Rd., St. Gabriel, LA 70776

Abstract

Most sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) cultivar development programs use single-row plots in their first clonal trials. We hypothesized that a larger plot size would increase the accuracy of selection and compared selection efficiencies of 1.82-, 3.35-, and 4.88-m single-row plots. The 1.82-m plots generated larger genetic and residual variances than the larger plot sizes for sugar and cane yields and stalk number and weight but not for sugar concentration. Broad-sense heritabilities for yield components for the examined plot sizes differed little. Genetic correlations for the same trait among the plot sizes were high for most traits except stalk number. Consequently, the correlated response in larger plots to selection for the same trait selected in small plots was not affected by plot size. The proportion needed to confidently retain the top 1% of the genotypes was also not affected by plot size but was very high (>80%) for sugar and cane yields. It was substantially lower for sugar concentration and stalk weight (<43%), whereas it was higher (43–55%) for stalk number. The estimated probability of retaining the top genotypes by selecting the top 33% of the population was 59 to 66% for sugar and cane yields, but it ranged from 77 to 90% for the other yield components. Thus, increasing the plot size would not improve the selection efficiency of the program, but the study highlighted that there was still room for improvement in the initial stage of selection.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2007. Crop Science Society of AmericaCrop Science Society of America