About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions

Crop Science Abstract - TURFGRASS SCIENCE

Selection of Bioassay Method Influences Detection of Annual Bluegrass Resistance to Mitotic-Inhibiting Herbicides


This article in CS

  1. Vol. 49 No. 3, p. 1088-1095
    Received: May 1, 2008

    * Corresponding author(s): jsm0010@auburn.edu
Request Permissions

  1. Matthew A. Cutullea,
  2. J. Scott McElroy *b,
  3. Reginald W. Millwoodc,
  4. John C. Sorochanc and
  5. C. Neal Stewartc
  1. a Hampton Roads Agricultural Research and Education Center, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univ., Virginia Beach, VA 23455
    b Dep. of Agronomy and Soils, Auburn Univ., Auburn, AL 36849
    c Dep. of Plant Sciences, Univ. of Tennessee, 252 Ellington Plant Science Bldg., Knoxville, TN 37909


Dinitroaniline-resistant annual bluegrass (Poa annua L.) has been reported in several states; however, there are no standardized screening methods for detecting resistance. Research was conducted to evaluate screening techniques (Murashige and Skoog [MS] media, filter paper, hydroponics, and soil based) to detect herbicide resistance to dithiopyr, prodiamine, and pendimethalin in a suspected resistant ecotype of annual bluegrass from Chattanooga, TN (Chattanooga). A senstitive ecotype from Fresno, CA (Control) was also tested. All the bioassays were able to diagnose the ecotype from Chattanooga as resistant to prodiamine and pendimethalin. However, the degree of resistance was highly variable between bioassays. In hydroponics, the amount of prodiamine required to inhibit Chattanooga growth by 50% was 26 times more than Control. Comparatively, in MS media the amount of prodiamine required to inhibit Chattanooga growth by 50% was 80 times more than Control. Minor dithiopyr resistance from the Chattanooga ecotype was detected by the hydroponics, filter-paper and soil-based bioassays. Hydroponics provided the most rapid diagnosis of resistance, accessing resistance for a mature plant in 10 d. The MS-media bioassay had the least amount of confounding variables. These findings highlight the potential variation in results that can occur in mitotic-inhibiting herbicide resistance detection simply on the basis of how plant samples are assayed.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2009. Crop Science Society of AmericaCrop Science Society of America