About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Abstract

 

This article in CS

  1. Vol. 49 No. 5, p. 1781-1785
     
    Received: Dec 17, 2008
    Published: Sept, 2009


    * Corresponding author(s): ghartman@illinois.edu
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2135/cropsci2008.12.0710

Sources of Soybean Rust Resistance Challenged with Single-Spored Isolates of Phakopsora pachyrhizi

  1. C. Paula and
  2. G. L. Hartman *b
  1. a Dep. of Crop Sciences, Univ. of Illinois, 1101 West Peabody Dr., Urbana, IL 61801
    b USDA-ARS and Dep. of Crop Sciences, Univ. of Illinois, 1101 West Peabody Dr., Urbana, IL 61801. Trade and manufacturers' names are necessary to report factually on available data; however, the USDA neither guarantees nor warrants the standard of the product, and the use of the name by the USDA implies no approval of the product to the exclusion of others that may also be suitable

Abstract

Soybean rust, caused by the fungus Phakopsora pachyrhizi Syd., is a potentially devastating disease that can cause significant yield losses. Resistance in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] germplasm, both qualitative and quantitative, may be effective in providing at least partial control of soybean rust. A number of soybean genotypes have resistance to soybean rust, but few of these have been challenged with the recently recovered U.S. isolates. The objective of this study was to evaluate known sources of soybean rust resistance against U.S. isolates of P. pachyrhizi Twenty-eight soybean genotypes that either contained known major-genes for resistance or had been reported as new sources of soybean rust resistance, along with two susceptible checks, were challenged with six P. pachyrhizi isolates collected in the U.S. All six isolates produced similar phenotypic reactions within each of the genotypes. Five genotypes, including the Rpp1 source and the isoline of ‘Williams 82’ with Rpp1, had no visible lesions. Eleven genotypes produced red-brown lesions with few uredinia, including the sources of Rpp2 and Rpp3, and the remainder had susceptible tan lesions, including the source of resistance for Rpp4 Uredinial counts from genotypes producing red-brown lesions on live and fixed leaflets showed significant variation in the number of uredinia with a genotype × isolate interaction. Uredinial counts from genotypes producing tan lesions on live and fixed leaflets showed significant variation in the number of uredinia among genotypes, but there was no genotype × isolate interaction. There were significant correlations (r = 0.8, P < 0.0001; and r = 0.4, P < 0.0001) between uredinial counts based on live and fixed leaflets within genotypes producing red-brown lesions and those producing tan lesions, respectively.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2009. Crop Science Society of AmericaCrop Science Society of America