About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions



This article in CS

  1. Vol. 52 No. 6, p. 2494-2500
    Received: Apr 19, 2012
    Published: October 10, 2012

    * Corresponding author(s): Jochen.Reif@uni-hohenheim.de


Relevance of Specific versus General Combining Ability in Winter Wheat

  1. Manje Gowdaa,
  2. C. Friedrich H. Longina,
  3. Volker Leinb and
  4. Jochen C. Reif *a
  1. a State Plant Breeding Institute, Univ. of Hohenheim, 70593 Stuttgart, Germany
    b Saaten Union Recherche SAS, 163 Avenue de Flandre, F-60190 Estrées-Saint-Denis, France


Knowledge of quantitative genetic parameters is crucial in allocating resources for different steps of multistage selection programs. The main objective of the present study was to investigate the magnitude of variance of general combining ability (GCA) and specific combining ability (SCA) effects and their interaction with environments in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). We used four data sets (Exp. 1, 2, 3, and 4) generated in commercial hybrid winter wheat breeding programs with a total of 940 hybrids evaluated in multienvironment trials in 2010 and 2011 in France. In at least three out of four experiments, general combining ability variance for females (σ2GCA-F), specific combining ability variance (σ2SCA), general combining ability of females × environment interaction variance (σ2GCA-F×E), and general combining ability of males × times environment interaction variance (σ2GCA-M×E) were significantly larger than zero but general combining ability variance for males (σ2GCA-M) was significant only in Exp. 4. For Exp. 3, we found no significant difference between the best performing hybrid and the best performing commercial variety. In contrast, 1.8% of hybrids in Exp. 2 and more than 21% of the hybrids in Exp. 1 and 4 significantly (P < 0.05) outperformed the best commercial variety included in the respective experiment. This superiority was even apparent when projecting our findings on line varieties of the same cycle of selection. In Exp. 2, 3, and 4, general combining ability variance (σ2GCA) was more pronounced compared to σ2SCA. Moreover, correlation between GCA predicted and observed hybrid performance was medium to high (rExp.1 = 0.50, P < 0.01; rExp.2 = 0.90, P < 0.01; rExp.3 = 0.59, P < 0.01; and rExp.4 = 0.92, P < 0.01). Consequently, selection based on GCA effects is promising in hybrid wheat breeding program.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2012. Copyright © by the Crop Science Society of America, Inc.