About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions

Members of ASA, CSSA, and SSSA: Due to system upgrades, your subscriptions in the digital library will be unavailable from May 15th to May 22nd. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause, and thank you for your patience. If you have any questions, please call our membership department at 608-273-8080.


Institutional Subscribers: Institutional subscription access will not be interrupted for existing subscribers who have access via IP authentication, though new subscriptions or changes will not be available during the upgrade period. For questions, please email us at: queries@dl.sciencesocieties.org or call Danielle Lynch: 608-268-4976.



This article in CS

  1. Vol. 6 No. 1, p. 82-83
    Received: Aug 4, 1965

Request Permissions


Agronomic and Cytotaxonomic Comparisons Between Digitaria decumbens and D. pentzii1

  1. S. C. Schank,
  2. H. F. Decker,
  3. G. B. Killinger and
  4. R. J. Allen2



Pangolagrass (Digitaria decumbens Stent.) and two strains of Digitaria pentzii Stent, introduced via Taiwan were evaluated from a cytotaxonomic and agronomic viewpoint. The two introductions of D. pentzii, A-24 and A-82, were taxonomically identical and have a regular meiosis with a 2n chromosome number of 18, a number not previously reported for this species. Pangolagrass, in contrast, has a 2n chromosome number of 27 and a very irregular meiosis with up to 9 laggard univalents at anaphase I. The most obvious taxonomic distinction between these grasses, which is most easily observed in young material, is the hairiness of the lower culm and stem sheaths in D. pentzii as compared to the glabrousness or only sparse hairiness in pangolagrass. Both D. pentzii introductions are less winter hardy than pangolagrass and can not be recommended in areas north of the 26° latitude in Florida.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © .