About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Abstract

 

This article in JEQ


  1.  
    Received: Dec 12, 2013
    Published: August 15, 2014


    * Corresponding author(s): fabiangf@umn.edu
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions

doi:10.2134/jeq2013.12.0496

Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Anhydrous Ammonia, Urea, and Polymer-Coated Urea in Illinois Cornfields

  1. Fabián G. Fernández *a,
  2. Richard E. Terryb and
  3. Eric G. Coronelc
  1. a Dep. of Soil, Water, and Climate, Univ. of Minnesota, S233 Soils, 1991 Upper Bufford Circle, St. Paul, MN, 55108
    b Plant and Wildlife Sciences, Brigham Young Univ., 255 WIDB, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602
    c Dep. of Crop Sciences, Univ. of Illinois, 1102 South Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL. 61801

Abstract

The use of alternative N sources relative to conventional ones could mitigate soil-surface N2O emissions. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of anhydrous ammonia (AA), urea, and polymer-coated urea (ESN) on N2O emissions for continuous corn (Zea mays L.) production. Corn received 110 kg N ha−1 in 2009 and 180 kg N ha−1 in 2010 and 2011. Soil N2O fluxes were measured one to three times per week early in the growing season and less frequently later, using vented non–steady state closed chambers and a gas chromatograph. Regardless of N source, N2O emissions were largest immediately after substantial (>20 mm) rains, dropping to background levels thereafter. Averaged across N sources, 2.85% of the applied N was lost as N2O. Emission differences for treatments only occurred in 2010, the year with maximum N2O production. In the 2010 growing season, cumulative emissions (in kg N2O–N ha−1) were lowest for the check (2.21), followed by ESN (9.77), and ESN was lower than urea (14.07) and AA (16.89). Emissions in 2010 based on unit of corn yield produced followed a similar pattern, and N2O emissions calculated as percent of applied N showed that AA losses were 1.9 times greater than ESN. Across years, relative to AA, ESN reduced N2O emissions, emissions per unit of corn yield, and emissions per unit of N applied, whereas urea produced intermediate values. The study indicates that, under high N loss potential (wet and warm conditions), ESN could reduce N2O emissions more that urea and AA.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2014. Copyright © by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc.

Facebook   Twitter