About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Abstract

 

This article in JEQ

  1. Vol. 19 No. 2, p. 180-187
     
    Received: Nov 2, 1988


    * Corresponding author(s):
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
Request Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2134/jeq1990.00472425001900020003x

Sensitivity of Tree Seedlings to Aluminum: III. Red Spruce and Loblolly Pine

  1. D. J. Raynal *,
  2. J. D. Joslin,
  3. F. C. Thornton,
  4. M. Schaedle and
  5. G. S. Henderson
  1. S UNY College of Environ. Science and Forestry, Syracuse, NY 13210;
    T VA Coop. Forest Studies Program, Bldg. 1506, ORNL, P.O. Box 2008, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6038;
    T VA, Atmospheric Science Dep., 210 Chemical Eng. Bldg., Muscle Shoals, AL 35660;
    D ep. of Forestry, Univ. of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211.

Abstract

Abstract

Unexplained declines in the growth of both red spruce (Picea rubens Sarg.) and loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) have been reported within their natural ranges recently. The possible role of Al phytotoxicity as a causal agent in these declines has been studied extensively. Results of experiments with seedlings grown in solution, sand, and soil indicate minimal involvement of Al in the decline of loblolly pine. However, both controlled studies and field data indicate that reductions in tissue Ca and Mg may occur at Al concentrations well below those causing direct injury. Thus, Al may be involved in reductions in pine growth through interference with nutrient uptake and translocation. Several independent studies demonstrate that Al does directly affect growth of red spruce seedlings at Al concentrations of ≤0.25 mM, a concentration that might approach the range of soil solution Al concentrations measured in native red spruce stands in the Appalachian Mountains (0.1–0.28 mM). In these seedling studies, concentration of Ca and Mg in red spruce roots and foliage were also markedly reduced by relatively low solution Al concentrations. Thus, a contributing role for Al phytotoxicity in red spruce decline, through both direct biomass reduction and indirect effects due to interference with nutrient uptake, appears plausible.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © .