About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Members of ASA, CSSA, and SSSA: Due to system upgrades, your subscriptions in the digital library will be unavailable from May 15th to May 22nd. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause, and thank you for your patience. If you have any questions, please call our membership department at 608-273-8080.

 

Institutional Subscribers: Institutional subscription access will not be interrupted for existing subscribers who have access via IP authentication, though new subscriptions or changes will not be available during the upgrade period. For questions, please email us at: queries@dl.sciencesocieties.org or call Danielle Lynch: 608-268-4976.

Abstract

 

This article in JEQ

  1. Vol. 24 No. 2, p. 352-359
     
    Received: Mar 25, 1994


    * Corresponding author(s):
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
Request Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2134/jeq1995.00472425002400020019x

Soil Water Balance Changes in Engineered Soil Surfaces

  1. M. R. Sackschewsky *,
  2. C. J. Kemp,
  3. S. O. Link and
  4. W. J. Waugh
  1. P acific Northwest Lab., P.O. Box 999, Richland, WA 99352;
    E nvironmental Sciences Lab., U.S. Dep. of Energy Grand Junction Projects Office, P.O. Box 14000, Grand Junction, CO 81503.

Abstract

Abstract

Permanent disposal of radioactive waste requires the construction of isolation barriers that minimize both recharge and erosion. Recharge can be prevented by storing precipitation near the surface so that it will be returned to the atmosphere via evapotranspiration. Erosion can be reduced with gravel mulch, but thick gravel layers may increase recharge. Gravel mixed into the surface soil may provide erosion protection without increasing recharge. To compare the effects that erosion control has on infiltration, two lysimeter experiments were conducted to examine the effects of sand and gravel mulches and gravel admixtures, using two precipitation regimens and with or without vegetation. Sand and gravel mulch increased soil-column water storage and decreased evapotranspiration compared with a plain soil surface. Gravel admixtures did not significantly affect the soil water balance compared with plain soil surfaces. Vegetation increased evapotranspiration and decreased soil moisture storage compared with nonvegetated treatments. Irrigation greatly increased evapotranspiration but had little effect on soil water storage. Drainage was detected from sand and gravel-mulch lysimeters, but not from lysimeters with a plain-soil or gravel-admixture surface. Results are significant for isolation barrier designs in arid sites: (i) a nonvegetated gravel-mulch surface eventually will result in recharge, even under low precipitation (160 mm/yr); and (ii) a soil column with a plain-soil or gravel-admixture surface is capable of recycling all water back to the atmosphere, even under high-precipitation (450 mm/yr).

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © .