About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Abstract

 

This article in JEQ

  1. Vol. 33 No. 6, p. 2056-2069
     
    Received: July 16, 2003
    Published: Nov, 2004


    * Corresponding author(s): mccartyg@ba.ars.usda.gov
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2134/jeq2004.2056

Near- and Mid-Infrared Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy for Measuring Soil Metal Content

  1. Grzegorz Siebieleca,
  2. Gregory W. McCarty *b,
  3. Tomasz I. Stuczynskia and
  4. James B. Reevesb
  1. a Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation, Pulawy, Poland
    b USDA-ARS, Environmental Quality Laboratory, Beltsville, MD 20705

Abstract

Rapid and nondestructive methods such as diffuse reflectance infrared spectroscopy provide potentially useful alternatives to time-consuming chemical methods of soil metal analysis. To assess the utility of near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) and diffuse mid-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (DRIFTS) for soil metal determination, 70 soil samples from the metal mining region of Tarnowskie Gory (Upper Silesia, Poland) were analyzed by both chemical and spectroscopic methods. Soils represented a wide range of pH (4.0–8.0), total carbon (5.1–73.2 g kg−1), and textural classes (from sand to silty clay loam). Soils had various contents of metals (14–4500 mg kg−1 for Zn, 18–6530 mg kg−1 for Pb, and 0.17–34 mg kg−1 for Cd), ranging from natural background levels to high contents indicative of industrial contamination in the region. Soil samples were scanned at the wavelengths from 400 to 2498 nm (near-infrared region) and from 2500 to 25000 nm (mid-infrared region). Calibrations were developed using the one-out validation procedure under partial least squares (PLS) regression. Mid-infrared spectroscopy markedly outperformed NIRS. Iron, Cd, Cu, Ni, and Zn were successfully predicted using DRIFTS. The coefficients of determination (R 2) between actual and predicted contents were 0.97, 0.94, 0.80, 0.99, and 0.96 for those metals, respectively. Only Pb content was predicted poorly. Calibrations using NIRS were less accurate. Root mean squared deviation (RMSD) values were from 1.27 (Pb) to 3.3 (Ni) times higher for NIRS than for DRIFTS. Results indicate that DRIFTS may be useful for accurate predictions of metals if samples originate from one region.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2004. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science SocietyASA, CSSA, SSSA