About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Abstract

 

This article in JEQ

  1. Vol. 35 No. 2, p. 459-467
     
    Received: Feb 22, 2005
    Published: Mar, 2006


    * Corresponding author(s): changxincau@163.com
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2134/jeq2005.0063

Predicting Soil Erosion for Alternative Land Uses

  1. Erda Wanga,
  2. Chang Xin *b,
  3. Jimmy R. Williamsc and
  4. Cheng Xud
  1. a Department of Agribusiness, Tarleton State University, Box T-0050, Stephenville, TX 76402; School of Management, Dalian University of Technology, No. 2 Linggong Rd., Dalian, P.R. China 116024
    b China Agricultural University, Yuanmingyuanxilu no. 2, Beijing, P.R. China 100094; Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Science, Yangling, Shaanxi, P.R. China 712100
    c Blackland Research and Extension Center, Texas A&M University System, 720 E. Blackland Rd., Temple, TX 76502
    d China Agricultural University, Yuanmingyuanxilu no. 2, Beijing, P.R. China 100094

Abstract

The APEX (Agricultural Policy–Environmental eXtender) model developed in the United States was calibrated for northwestern China's conditions. The model was then used to investigate soil erosion effects associated with alternative land uses at the ZFG (Zi-Fang-Gully) watershed in northwestern China. The results indicated that the APEX model could be calibrated reasonably well (±15% errors) to fit those areas with >50% slope within the watershed. Factors being considered during calibration include runoff, RUSLE (Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation) slope length and steepness factor, channel capacity flow rate, floodplain saturated hydraulic conductivity, and RUSLE C factor coefficient. No changes were made in the APEX computer code. Predictions suggest that reforestation is the best practice among the eight alternative land uses (the status quo, all grass, all grain, all grazing, all forest, half tree and half grass, 70% tree and 30% grain, and construction of a reservoir) for control of water runoff and soil erosion. Construction of a reservoir is the most effective strategy for controlling sediment yield although it does nothing to control upland erosion. For every 1 Mg of crop yield, 11 Mg of soil were lost during the 30-yr simulation period, suggesting that expanding land use for food production should not be encouraged on the ZFG watershed. Grass species are less effective than trees in controlling runoff and erosion on steep slopes because trees generally have deeper and more stable root systems.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2006. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science SocietyASA, CSSA, SSSA