About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Abstract

 

This article in JEQ

  1. Vol. 35 No. 6, p. 2250-2260
     
    Received: Sept 12, 2005


    * Corresponding author(s): jessica.davis@colostate.edu
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
Request Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2134/jeq2005.0348

Antibiotic Transport via Runoff and Soil Loss

  1. J. G. Davis *a,
  2. C. C. Trumanb,
  3. S. C. Kimc,
  4. J. C. Ascoughd and
  5. K. Carlsone
  1. a Dep. of Soil & Crop Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1170
    b USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Southeast Watershed Research Laboratory, Tifton, GA 31793-0946
    c Dep. of Civil Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1372
    d USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Great Plains Systems Research Unit, 2150 Centre Ave., Bldg. D, Ste. 200, Fort Collins, CO 80526
    e Dep. of Civil Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1372

Abstract

Research has verified the occurrence of veterinary antibiotics in manure, agricultural fields, and surface water bodies, yet little research has evaluated antibiotic runoff from agricultural fields. The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential for agricultural runoff to contribute antibiotics to surface water bodies in a worst-case scenario. Our hypothesis was that there would be significant differences in antibiotic concentrations, partitioning of losses between runoff and sediment, and pseudo-partitioning coefficients (ratio of sediment concentration to runoff concentration) among antibiotics. An antibiotic solution including tetracycline (TC), chlortetracycline (CTC), sulfathiazole (STZ), sulfamethazine (SMZ), erythromycin (ERY), tylosin (TYL), and monensin (MNS) was sprayed on the soil surface 1 h before rainfall simulation (average intensity = 60 mm h−1 for 1 h). Runoff samples were collected continuously and analyzed for aqueous and sediment antibiotic concentrations. MNS had the highest concentration in runoff, resulting in the highest absolute loss, although the amount of loss associated with sediment transport was <10%. ERY had the highest concentrations in sediment and had a relative loss associated with sediment >50%. TYL also had >50% relative loss associated with sediment, and its pseudo-partitioning coefficient (P-PC) was very high. The tetracyclines (TC and CTC) had very low aqueous concentrations and had the lowest absolute losses. If agricultural runoff is proven to result in development of resistance genes or toxicity to aquatic organisms, then erosion control practices could be used to reduce TC, ERY, and TYL losses leaving agricultural fields. Other methods will be needed to reduce transport of other antibiotics.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2006. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science SocietyASA, CSSA, SSSA