About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Abstract

 

This article in JEQ

  1. Vol. 37 No. 6, p. 2202-2211
     
    Received: Nov 7, 2007
    Published: Nov, 2008


    * Corresponding author(s): kak@farma.ku.dk
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2134/jeq2007.0592

Sorption and Mobility of Ivermectin in Different Soils

  1. K.A. Krogh *a,
  2. T. Søeborgab,
  3. B. Brodina and
  4. B. Halling-Sørensena
  1. a Copenhagen Univ., Faculty of Pharmaceutical Science, Dep. of Pharmaceutics and Analytical Chemistry, Section of Toxicology and Environmental Chemistry, Universitetsparken 2, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
    b present address, Danish Medicines Agency, Axel Heides Gade 1, DK-2300 Copenhagen, Denmark

Abstract

Avermectins are widely used to treat livestock for parasite infections. Ivermectin, which belongs to the group of avermectins, is particularly hazardous to the environment, especially to crustaceans and to soil-dwelling organisms. Sorption is one of the key factors controlling transport and bioavailability. Therefore, batch studies have been conducted to characterize the sorption and desorption behavior of ivermectin in three European soils (Madrid, York, and artificial soil). The solid-water distribution coefficient (K d) for ivermectin sorption to the tested soils were between 57 and 396 L kg−1 (determined at 0.1 μg g−1), while the organic carbon-normalized sorption coefficients (K oc) ranged from 4.00 × 103 to 2.58 × 104 L kg−1 The Freundlich sorption coefficient (K F) was 396 (after 48 h) for the artificial soil over a concentration range of 0.1 to 50 μg g−1, with regression constants indicating a concentration-dependent sorption. The obtained data and data in the literature are inconclusive with regard to whether hydrophobic partitioning or more specific interactions are involved in sorption of avermectins. For abamectin, hydrophobic partitioning seems to be one of the dominant types of binding, while hydrophobicity is less important for ivermectin, which is probably due to the lower lipophilicity of the molecule. Furthermore, the presence of cations such as Ca2+ leads to decreasing sorption. Thus, it is presumed that ivermectin binds to soil by formation of complexes with immobile, inorganic soil matter. In contrast to abamectin, hysteresis could be excluded for ivermectin in the studied soils for the evaluation of sorption and desorption. The sorption mechanism is highly dependent on physicochemical properties of the avermectin.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2008. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science SocietyAmerican Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America