About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Abstract

 

This article in JEQ

  1. Vol. 38 No. 2, p. 493-501
     
    Received: Apr 17, 2008


    * Corresponding author(s): ilenia.cattani@unicatt.it
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2134/jeq2008.0175

The Role of Natural Purified Humic Acids in Modifying Mercury Accessibility in Water and Soil

  1. I. Cattani *a,
  2. H. Zhangb,
  3. G.M. Beonea,
  4. A.A.M. Del Rea,
  5. R. Boccellia and
  6. M. Trevisana
  1. a Inst. of Agricultural and Enviromental Chemistry, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Via Emilia Parmense 29100, Piacenza– Italy
    b Environmental Science Dep., LEC, Lancaster Univ., Lancaster LA1 4YQ, UK

Abstract

Contamination of soils with mercury can be a serious problem. It can be mobilized or stabilized by humic substances (HS) containing binding sites with reduced sulfur that can have different binding capacities for CH3Hg+ and for Hg2+ In this work we investigated the influence of different humic acids (HAs, extracted from lignite, compost, and forest soil) on mercury mobility and availability, both in a model solution and in soil samples from a mercury-polluted region. The technique of diffusive gradients in thin-films (DGT), which is capable of measuring: (i) free metal in solution; (ii) dissociated metal complexes previously mobilized by HA; (iii) mobilized metal-HA complexes that liberate metals by dissociation or by exchange reaction between the metal-HA complexes and the chelating groups on the resin-gel, was used in solutions and soils. The DGT measurements in solution, together with ultrafiltration, allowed estimation of the lability of Hg-HA complexes. Ultrafiltration results were also compared with predictions made by the windermere humic-aqueous model (WHAM). According to both these different approaches, Hg2+ resulted nearly 100% complexed by HAs, whereas results from ultrafiltration showed that 32 to 72% of the CH3Hg+ was bound to the HAs, with higher values for compost and lower values for forest and Aldrich HA. The DGT-measured mercury in soils was below 0.20 μg L−1, irrespective of the extent of the contamination. Addition of HA increased the concentration of DGT-measured mercury in soil solution up to 100-fold in the contaminated soil and up to 30-fold in the control soil. The level of the increase also depended on the HA. The smallest increase (about 10 times) was found for lignite HA in both control and contaminated soils. The addition of forest HA gave the largest increases in DGT-measured mercury, in particular for the contaminated soil. Overall, the results demonstrated that DGT can be used for estimating the lability of mercury complexes in solution and for verifying enhanced mercury mobility when HA is added to contaminated soils.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2009. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science SocietyAmerican Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America